Sran v. Regents of the University of California

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Fact Discovery Deadline filed by Linda Centore, Regents of the University of California, Dorothy Perry. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 16, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN 166805)
[e-mail]
AL YSON S. CABRERA (SBN 222717)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER M. LYNCH (SBN 272976)
[e-mail]
GORDON & REES
SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
DR. LINDA CENTORE AND DR. DOROTHY PERRY

9
10
11
c
c
c-

12

~~...:1;<.:::~

13

N-

...:1=<
"'rLJ
~...rU

~

~
i:::::

0

'0

~
~
~

0~

>. ~
~
~

14

u

iZi .r:a
~
~

~:::~
(J ~
~
lrlrLJ
t-

JAY T. JAMBECK (SBN 226018)
MANDY G. LEIGH (SBN 225748)
LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C.
870 Market Street, Suite 1157
San Francisco, CA 941 02
Telephone:
415-399-9155
Facsimile:
415-795-3 733
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

15

Attorneys for Plaintiff
KULGINDER SRAN

==

16

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

N

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO

19

KULGINDER SRAN,
Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23

vs.
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, Dr. LINDA CENTORE, an
individual, Dr. DOROTHY PERRY, an
individual,

24
Defendants.
25
26

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C-15-4471-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE FACT
DISCOVERY DEADLINE

27
28
-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE

RECITALS

1
2

WHEREAS the trial date in this matter is currently set for April 17, 2017;

3

WHEREAS the deadline for completion of all non-expert discovery is October 14, 20 16;

4

WHEREAS Plaintiffs counsel recently propounded a substantial amount of discovery on

5

Defendants, which Defendants need additional time to respond to;

6

WHEREAS the parties need additional time to conduct fact discovery;

7

WHEREAS the pleadings are not settled as the Court·has not yet ruled on Defendants'

8

Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss may impact the

9
10

discoverable issues in this matter;
WHEREAS the parties would suffer prejudice if the fact discovery cut-off date is not

11
Q
Q
Q

....

12

continued in light of the outstanding discovery needed;

M,...

~~

....

...:l;t:~

...:l=<
mOO
~...rU

~

~

§

~
~

:...

V:i

0~

WHEREAS extending the fact discovery cut-off date will not impact any of the other

13
14

deadlines in the Court's scheduling Order.

c.;

.[!3

STIPULATION

"~

15

==

16

N

17

in this matter is continued for approximately thirty (30) days from October 14, 2016, until

18

November 14,2016.

"E~f!
o""'~Jo.
1-' = =

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIUPLATED THAT the fact discovery cut-off deadline

11100

t--

19
20

Dated:

GORDON & REES LLP

August 16, 2016

21

By:

22

Is/Jennifer M. Lynch
Alyson S. Cabrera
Jennifer M. Lynch
Attorneys for Defendants

23
24

Dated:

LEIGH LAW GROUP

August 16, 2016

25
By:

26
27

/s/Jay T. Jambeck
Jay T. Jambeck
Mandy Leigh
Attorneys for Plaintiff

28
-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER
It is hereby ordered that the fact discovery cut-off deadline in this matter is continued

2

from October 14, 2016, until November 14, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DERED
S . Ti ga r

O OR
IT IS S

8

c::>

c::>
c::> .....

LI

ER

H

11

RT

10

n
J u d ge J o

A

9

R NIA

HON. JON S. TIGAR

FO

7

August 16, 2016

NO

6

Dated:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

5

S

4

UNIT
ED

3

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12

M,.....

~Q,j

....

~:':::~

13

t....rU~

14

~=<
"'r/1
~

Q,j
Q,j

0

in

,fa

I..

a(!

§

Col

"~

'E~f

o'"'~
t;,!) ~

=

~ ~

15
16

ll'lr/1

tM

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1112749/29297917v.l

.-3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE