White v. Morse
Filing
4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND re 1 Complaint filed by Larry White. Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/17/15. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LARRY WHITE,
Case No. 15-cv-04488-JD
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE
TO AMEND
9
10
DAVID MCNEIL MORSE,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Larry White, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §
13
14
1983. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
DISCUSSION
15
16
I.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
17
Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek
18
redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.
19
§ 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims
20
which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek
21
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se
22
pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th
23
Cir. 1990).
24
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the
25
claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Although a complaint “does not need detailed
26
factual allegations, . . . a plaintiff’s obligation to provide the ‘grounds’ of his ‘entitle[ment] to
27
relief’ requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a
28
cause of action will not do. . . . Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above
1
the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citations
2
omitted). A complaint must proffer “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its
3
face.” Id. at 570. The United States Supreme Court has explained the “plausible on its face”
4
standard of Twombly: “While legal conclusions can provide the framework of a complaint, they
5
must be supported by factual allegations. When there are well-pleaded factual allegations, a court
6
should assume their veracity and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement
7
to relief.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009).
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that: (1) a right secured by
8
9
the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) the alleged deprivation was
committed by a person acting under the color of state law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
II.
12
13
14
LEGAL CLAIMS
Plaintiff alleges that his appellate attorney for his criminal conviction failed to timely send
plaintiff the case transcripts. Plaintiff seeks money damages.
Defendants in state court prosecutions cannot generally sue their lawyers under Section
15
1983 for mistakes in their representation. A public defender does not act under color of state law,
16
an essential element of an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, when performing a lawyer’s traditional
17
functions, such as entering pleas, making motions, objecting at trial, cross-examining witnesses,
18
and making closing arguments. Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 318–19 (1981). A private
19
attorney representing a defendant or appellant also is not a state actor. See Simmons v.
20
Sacramento County Superior Court, 318 F.3d 1156, 1161 (9th Cir. 2003).
21
From the exhibits, it appears that the appellate attorney was a private attorney assigned to
22
represent plaintiff in the criminal appeal. Plaintiff’s allegations against him fall within the scope
23
of work that Polk County has determined is not actionable under Section 1983. For this reason,
24
the claim may not proceed. Nor can plaintiff present a state cause of action for malpractice under
25
Section 1983. See Ove v. Gwinn, 264 F.3d 817, 824 (9th Cir. 2001) (“To the extent that the
26
violation of a state law amounts to the deprivation of a state-created interest that reaches beyond
27
that guaranteed by the federal Constitution, Section 1983 offers no redress.”) (internal quotation
28
marks and citation omitted). Plaintiff will be provided an opportunity to amend.
2
CONCLUSION
1
2
1.
The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. The amended complaint must
3
be filed within twenty-eight (28) days of the date this order is filed and must include the caption
4
and civil case number used in this order and the words AMENDED COMPLAINT on the first
5
page. Because an amended complaint completely replaces the original complaint, plaintiff must
6
include in it all the claims he wishes to present. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th
7
Cir. 1992). He may not incorporate material from the original complaint by reference. Failure to
8
amend within the designated time will result in the dismissal of this case.
9
2.
It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the
Court informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper with the clerk headed “Notice
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
of Change of Address,” and must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely fashion. Failure to
12
do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of
13
Civil Procedure 41(b).
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 17, 2015
16
________________________
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
LARRY WHITE,
Case No. 15-cv-04488-JD
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
DAVID MCNEIL MORSE,
Defendant.
8
9
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
That on November 17, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
Larry White
G37720
P.O. Box 5242
Corcoran, CA 93212
19
20
21
Dated: November 17, 2015
22
23
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
27
By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?