Smith v. Brennan et al

Filing 27

Order by Hon. William H. Orrick granting 15 Motion to Dismiss. Smith is advised to carefully review this Order and to file a first amended complaint that addresses my concerns. If he is unable to state a plausible claim in his first amended complaint, the case may be dismissed with prejudice because of the apparent res judicata effect of the prior lawsuits and timeliness issues. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RONALD SMITH, Case No. 15-cv-04516-WHO Plaintiff, 8 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 9 10 MEGAN J. BRENNAN, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on 4/13/2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. 16 17 18 Ronald Smith 225 41st Street, No. 601 Piedmont, CA 94611 19 20 Dated: 4/13/2016 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court By:________________________ Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable WILLIAM H. ORRICK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?