Smith v. Brennan et al
Filing
27
Order by Hon. William H. Orrick granting 15 Motion to Dismiss. Smith is advised to carefully review this Order and to file a first amended complaint that addresses my concerns. If he is unable to state a plausible claim in his first amended complaint, the case may be dismissed with prejudice because of the apparent res judicata effect of the prior lawsuits and timeliness issues. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RONALD SMITH,
Case No. 15-cv-04516-WHO
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on 4/13/2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said
copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail.
16
17
18
Ronald Smith
225 41st Street, No. 601
Piedmont, CA 94611
19
20
Dated: 4/13/2016
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
By:________________________
Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable WILLIAM H. ORRICK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?