Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. et al

Filing 180

ORDER to submit declarations supporting Administrative Motions to Seal 108 , 152 . Defendants shall file responsive declarations consistent with Civil Local Rules 79-5(e)(1) and 79-5(d)(1)(A) by February 29, 2016. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/25/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP
(SINGAPORE) PTE LTD.,,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 15-cv-04525-EMC (DMR)
ORDER TO SUBMIT DECLARATIONS
SUPPORTING MOTIONS TO SEAL

v.
ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC., et al.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 108, 152

Defendants.

12

On December 3, 2015, Plaintiff Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd filed

13

a motion to seal Exhibit 10 to the Holohan Declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel.

14

Docket No. 108. The Hon. Edward M. Chen referred the case to the undersigned for all discovery

15

disputes, including the Motion to Compel and the Motion to File Under Seal. Docket No. 109.

16

Plaintiff moved to seal the exhibit on the grounds that it consisted entirely of pages that

17

Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International had designated as

18

“Restricted—Attorney’s Eyes Only.” Docket No. 108-1 at ¶ 4.

19

On December 29, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to seal Exhibit 1 to the parties’ Joint

20

Discovery Letter Brief [Docket No. 151] on the basis that the exhibit consisted entirely of pages

21

that Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International had designated as

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

“Restricted—Attorney’s Eyes Only” pursuant to the Protective Order. Docket Nos. 152, 152-1.
Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International have not filed
responsive declarations for either motion as required by Civil Local Rules 79-5(e)(1) and 795(d)(1)(A) establishing that these documents are sealable.
Therefore, by February 29, 2016, Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS
Computer International shall each file either a responsive declaration establishing that the
documents are sealable or a statement that it does not seek to seal the information attached to the

1

motion to compel and to the joint discovery letter.

2
3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 25, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2