Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. et al

Filing 277

STIPULATION AND ORDER denying 276 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF filed by Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) PTE Ltd. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/3/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
David E. Sipiora (SBN 124951)
Kristopher L. Reed (SBN 235518)
Matthew C. Holohan (SBN 239040)
1400 Wewatta St., Suite 600
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Robert J. Artuz (SBN 227789)
Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff

12

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP
(SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.,

17
Plaintiff,
18
v.

Case No.: 3:15-CV-04525-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
RELIEF
(Denied)

19
20

ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS
COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
Defendants.

21
22

Pursuant to Civil L.Rs. 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiff Avago Technologies General IP

23
24

(Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“Avago”) and Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc., and ASUS Computer

25

International (collectively, “ASUS”) respectfully request that the hearing on Avago’s Motion for

26

Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions currently set for November 17, 2016 at 1:30 p.m., be

27

rescheduled to November 2, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. This will permit the motion to be heard on the

28

same date as the parties’ pending Daubert motions and motions for summary judgment.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
Case No. 3:15-cv-4525-EMC
Page 1

Dated: September 29, 2016

By:

2
3

/s/ David E. Sipiora
David E. Sipiora

Attorneys for Plaintiff Avago Technologies General
IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

4
Dated: September 29, 2016

6

ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
By:

7

/s/ Michael J. Newton (with permission)
Michael J. Newton

Attorneys for Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
and ASUS Computer International

9

11

Dated:

October 3, 2016

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

10

D
UNITED STATES JUDGE
DENIE

12
13

RT

15

dwa
Judge E

ER

17

A

H

16

hen

rd M. C

NO

14

R NIA

8

FO

5

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

LI

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
Case No. 3:15-cv-4525-EMC
Page 2