Shrem v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Filing 29

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Stipulation re 12 Clerk's Notice,, Adjourning Case Management Conference (Civ. L. R. 6-2(a)). (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)

1 Bruce J. Zabarauskas (Cal. Bar. No. 248601)
Thompson & Knight LLP
2 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
4 Attorneys for Defendant
Southwest Airlines Co.
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9 JEAN SHREM, and MARNI FISCHER,
individually and on behalf of others similarly
10 situated,
11
12
13

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 15-cv-04567-HSG
STIPULATION AND
ORDER ADJOURNING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
(Civ. L.R. 6-2(a))

vs.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.,

14
15
16
17

Defendant.
WHEREAS, Jean Shrem and Marni Fischer (the “Plaintiffs”) commenced the abovecaptioned action on October 2, 2015;

18
19

WHEREAS, on November 12, 2015, Southwest Airlines Co. (the “Defendant”) filed a

20 motion to dismiss (the “Motion To Dismiss”) the above-captioned action pursuant to Rule 12 of
21

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

22
23

WHEREAS, a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for January 21, 2016;

24
25
26

WHEREAS, the initial case management conference (the “Case Management
Conference”) in this action is currently scheduled for January 12, 2016;

27
28
STIPULATION ADJOURNING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Civ. L.R. 6-2(a))
1
516441 000078 16477255.1

1

WHEREAS, the parties believe that the interests of justice and judicial economy would

2 best be served if the Case Management Conference is adjourned to a date which is after the
3

hearing date on the Motion To Dismiss because: (i) if the Motion to Dismiss is granted, the Case

4
Management Conference will be moot; and (ii) if the Motion to Dismiss is denied or only
5
6

granted in part, the issues to be discussed at the Case Management Conference may be better

7 framed;
8

WHEREAS, there have been no previous requests to adjourn the Case Management

9
10

Conference; 1

11
12

WHEREAS, the adjournment requested herein, will have no effect on the schedule for
the case, other than to moving the deadline for the parties to file their joint case management

13
report and ADR certification from one week before the existing date for the Case Management
14
15

Conference to one week before the adjourned Case Management Conference date, and similarly

16 moving any deadlines under Federal Rule 26 based upon the adjourned Case Management
17 Conference date;
18
NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned parties that,

19

20 subject to Court approval of this Stipulation, the Case Management Conference is adjourned
21 from January 12, 2016 to February 9, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
22 Dated: December 11, 2015
23 LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN

THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP.

24
25 By: /s/ Peter S. Fredman_______________
Peter B. Fredman
26
Attorney for Plaintiffs

By: /s/ Bruce J. Zabarauskas__________
Bruce J. Zabarauskas
Attorney for the Defendant

27
1

Though a case management conference had been scheduled before prior to the case being assigned to Judge

28 Gilliam, the notice for such conference was vacated upon the assignment of the case to Judge Gilliam.
STIPULATION ADJOURNING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Civ. L.R. 6-2(a))
2
516441 000078 16477255.1

1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED
THIS 15th DAY OF DECEMBER 2015:
2
3

_________________________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION ADJOURNING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Civ. L.R. 6-2(a))
3
516441 000078 16477255.1