Anthony Peel v. County of San Mateo et al

Filing 27

SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 6/17/2016. Expert disclosures 9/21/2016. Expert rebuttal 11/11/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 11/18/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 12/14/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motion s 1/16/2017. Pretrial conference statement due 3/28/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/7/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 5/1/2017-5/11/2017 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 16, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ANTHONY PEEL,

Case No. 15-cv-04694-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
11

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

June 17, 2016

Expert disclosures

September 21, 2016

20

Expert rebuttal

November 11, 2016.

21

Fact discovery cut-off

November 18, 2016

22

Expert discovery cut-off

December 14, 2016.

Deadline to file dispositive motions

January 16, 2017

Pretrial conference statement due

March 28, 2017

Pretrial conference

April 7, 2017 at 2:00
p.m.

Trial

May 1, 2017 at 8:30
a.m.

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

Event

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

Deadline

Estimate of trial length (in days)

Eight

This case will be tried to a jury.
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
to grant a continuance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
Dated: March 16, 2016
17
18
19

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2