Lori L Holland et al v. California Physicians' Service et al

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING re 17 - Stipulation and Proposed Order for Dismissal with Prejudice - filed by Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, California Physicians' Service, Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance Company. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/6/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP JOHN M. LEBLANC (Bar No. CA 155842) E-mail: jleblanc@manatt.com JOHN T. FOGARTY (Bar No. CA 198119) E-mail: jfogarty@manatt.com 11355 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90064-1614 Telephone: (310) 312-4000 Facsimile: (310) 312-4224 Attorneys for Defendants California Physicians’ Service dba Blue Shield of California, Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance Company, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 LORI L. HOLLAND and CHRISTOPHER T. HOLLAND, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 vs. Case No. 3:15-CV-04714 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS’ SERVICE dba BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA; BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY; BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION; and Does 1-10, Defendants. 19 20 Action filed: September 11, 2015 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES 315837632.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs LORI L. 4 HOLLAND and CHRISTOPHER T. HOLLAND and defendants CALIFORNIA 5 PHYSICIANS’ SERVICE dba BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA; BLUE 6 SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY; and 7 BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION (collectively, the “Parties”), 8 through their respective counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court and 9 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and the settlement agreement 10 reached between the Parties that this entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice, 11 and that all Parties shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in 12 connection with this action. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties and 13 this action for the purpose of enforcing the Parties’ settlement agreement. 14 15 Dated: January 5, 2015 16 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP John M. LeBlanc John T. Fogarty By: 17 18 19 20 /s/ John T. Fogarty John M. LeBlanc John T. Fogarty Attorneys for Defendants California Physicians’ Service dba Blue Shield of California, Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance Company, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association 21 22 Dated: January 5, 2015 CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP 23 24 By: 25 26 /s/ Joseph Creitz Joseph Creitz Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lori L. Holland and Christopher T. Holland 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES 315837632.1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 4 /s/ John T. Fogarty John T. Fogarty 5 6 7 8 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 9 WITH PREJUDICE 10 The Court approves the parties’ stipulation and, finding no prejudice, orders 11 that Plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own 12 attorneys’ fees and costs; and that this Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the 13 settlement of this action. 14 15 Dated: January 6, 2016 /s/ Joseph C. Spero Honorable Joseph C. Spero United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES 315837632.1 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?