Levi Strauss & Co., v. Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc.
Filing
104
ORDER granting 102 , 103 STIPULATION AMENDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE re 101 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award. Responses due by 6/12/2020. Replies due by 6/26/2020. Motion Hearing reset for 7/15/2020 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/26/2020. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2020)
1 BROWNE GEORGE ROSS LLP
Eric M. George (State Bar No. 166403)
egeorge@bgrfirm.com
2
James L. Michaels (State Bar No. 298130)
jmichaels@bgrfirm.com
3
2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2800
4 Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 274-7100
5 Facsimile: (310) 275-5697
6 Attorneys for Defendant, AQUA
DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11 LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14 AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant.
15
16
Case No. 3:15-04718-WHO
The Hon. William H. Orrick
JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING
AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFF LEVI STRAUSS &
CO.’S MOTION TO CONFIRM
ARBITRATION AWARD
19
Filed Concurrently with [PROPOSED]
ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING
AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFF LEVI STRAUSS & CO.’S
MOTION TO CONFIRM
ARBITRATION AWARD
20
Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick
21
Trial Date: None Set
17
18
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1565679.1
Case No. 3:15-04718-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, on May 15, plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co. (“Levi’s”) filed a
1
2 motion to confirm an arbitration award (ECF No. 101);
WHEREAS, defendant Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc. (“Aqua”) intends to
3
4 oppose such motion;
5
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(a), the natural deadline for Aqua to
6 file its opposition to Levi’s motion is May 29, 2020;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c), the natural deadline for Levi’s to
7
8 file its reply brief is June 5, 2020;
9
WHEREAS, the motion is presently set for hearing on June 24, 2020;
WHEREAS, Aqua requested, and Levi’s agreed to, a modest extension in
10
11 view of challenges created by current stay-at-home orders and other scheduling
12 conflicts;
13
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following
14 amended briefing and hearing schedule on Levi’s motion:
15
1.
Aqua shall file its opposition brief on or before June 12, 2020 instead
16 of May 29, 2020;
17
2.
Levi’s shall file its reply brief on or before June 26, 2020 instead of
18 June 5, 2020; and
19
3.
The hearing on Levi’s motion shall proceed on July 15, 2020, or as
20 soon thereafter as it may be heard by the Court, instead of June 24, 2020.
21
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
1565679.1
Case No. 3:15-04718-WHO
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
1 DATED: May 22, 2020
2
BROWNE GEORGE ROSS LLP
Eric M. George
James L. Michaels
3
4
By:
/s/ James L. Michaels
James L. Michaels
Attorneys for Defendant, AQUA DYNAMICS
SYSTEMS, INC.
5
6
7
8
DATED: May 22, 2020
9
10
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
Robert A. McFarlane
Janie L. Thompson
Rosanna W. Gan
11
By:
/s/ Robert A. McFarlane
Robert A. McFarlane
Attorneys for Plaintiff, LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
12
13
14
15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16 DATED: May 26, 2020
By:
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Court Judge
17
18
19
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
20
21
22
23
I, James Michaels, am the ECF User whose identification and password are
being used to file this stipulation. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby
attest that all other signatories listed on whose behalf the filing is submitted concur
in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
24
25
DATED: May 22, 2020
26
/s/ James L. Michaels
James L. Michaels
27
28
1565679.1
Case No. 3:15-04718-WHO
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?