Levi Strauss & Co., v. Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc.

Filing 20

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RULE 26 DISCLOSURES ORDER THERON - Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Case Management Statement due by 2/23/2016.) Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/22/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY (SBN 99666) MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8500 Facsimile: (415) 984-8599 TFlaherty@mpplaw.com Attorneys appearing specially for Defendant AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RULE 26 DISCLOSURES ORDER THERON Plaintiff, v. 14 15 Case No. 15-cv-04718-WHO LEVI STRAUSS & CO., AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC., 16 Judge: Defendant. William H. Orrick 17 18 WHEREAS Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc. (“Aqua Dynamics”) and Levi 19 Strauss & Co. (“Levi’s”) entered into a stipulation to extend time for Aqua Dynamics to 20 respond to the complaint and the Court entered its order thereon dated December 7, 2015; 21 (Docket No. 13). 22 WHEREAS Aqua Dynamics has filed a motion to dismiss Levi’s complaint or 23 in the alternative stay the action pending arbitration and that motion is scheduled to be 24 heard on February 10, 2016. 25 26 WHEREAS, Aqua Dynamics contends this court does not have subject matter jurisdiction; 27 WHEREAS, in order to conserve client and court resources pending Aqua 28 Dynamics’ motion, the parties wish to continue the status conference scheduled for 30 I135188 31 32 1 CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 January 12, 2016 and continue the deadlines relating to Rule 26(f) conference and ADR disclosures; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed between the parties as follows: 1. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 12, 2016 be continued to March 1, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.; 2. That Rule 26(f) conference and ADR certification is continued to February 11, 2016; 3. The initial disclosures will be exchanged between the parties on February 18, 2016; Neither party shall use this extension period as the basis for any argument in this or any other matter pending between the parties. 12 DATED: December 22, 2015 HANSON BRIDGETT 13 By: /s/Robert A. McFarlane Robert A. McFarlane Attorneys for Plaintiff LEVI STRAUSS & CO. 14 15 16 DATED: December 22, 2015 MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP 17 18 19 By: /s/Timothy M. Flaherty Timothy M. Flaherty Attorneys appearing specially for Defendant AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC. 20 21 22 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(1)-(3), Timothy M. Flaherty hereby attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing of this document. 24 25 MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP 26 27 By: /s/Timothy M. Flaherty Timothy M. Flaherty 28 30 31 32 2 CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 ORDER The court having considered the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, orders as follows: 4 1. The Case Management Conference is continued from January 12, 2016 5 to March 1, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor at 450 Golden 6 Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102; 7 8 2. The initial disclosures between the parties will be exchanged on February 18, 2016; and 9 3. Counsel will schedule a Rule 26(f) conference and ADR on or before 10 February 11, 2016 and file their ADR certification on February 11, 11 2016. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 DATED: December 22, 2015 15 Judge William H. Orrick 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 3 CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?