Levi Strauss & Co., v. Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc.
Filing
20
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RULE 26 DISCLOSURES ORDER THERON - Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Case Management Statement due by 2/23/2016.) Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/22/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY (SBN 99666)
MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 984-8500
Facsimile: (415) 984-8599
TFlaherty@mpplaw.com
Attorneys appearing specially for Defendant
AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RULE 26 DISCLOSURES ORDER
THERON
Plaintiff,
v.
14
15
Case No. 15-cv-04718-WHO
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,
AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.,
16
Judge:
Defendant.
William H. Orrick
17
18
WHEREAS Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc. (“Aqua Dynamics”) and Levi
19
Strauss & Co. (“Levi’s”) entered into a stipulation to extend time for Aqua Dynamics to
20
respond to the complaint and the Court entered its order thereon dated December 7, 2015;
21
(Docket No. 13).
22
WHEREAS Aqua Dynamics has filed a motion to dismiss Levi’s complaint or
23
in the alternative stay the action pending arbitration and that motion is scheduled to be
24
heard on February 10, 2016.
25
26
WHEREAS, Aqua Dynamics contends this court does not have subject matter
jurisdiction;
27
WHEREAS, in order to conserve client and court resources pending Aqua
28
Dynamics’ motion, the parties wish to continue the status conference scheduled for
30
I135188
31
32
1
CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
January 12, 2016 and continue the deadlines relating to Rule 26(f) conference and ADR
disclosures;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed between the parties as follows:
1. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 12,
2016 be continued to March 1, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.;
2. That Rule 26(f) conference and ADR certification is continued to February
11, 2016;
3. The initial disclosures will be exchanged between the parties on February
18, 2016;
Neither party shall use this extension period as the basis for any argument in
this or any other matter pending between the parties.
12
DATED: December 22, 2015
HANSON BRIDGETT
13
By: /s/Robert A. McFarlane
Robert A. McFarlane
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
14
15
16
DATED: December 22, 2015
MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP
17
18
19
By: /s/Timothy M. Flaherty
Timothy M. Flaherty
Attorneys appearing specially for Defendant
AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.
20
21
22
23
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(1)-(3), Timothy M. Flaherty hereby attests that
all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the
filing’s content and have authorized the filing of this document.
24
25
MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP
26
27
By: /s/Timothy M. Flaherty
Timothy M. Flaherty
28
30
31
32
2
CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
3
ORDER
The court having considered the Stipulation of the parties and good cause
appearing, orders as follows:
4
1. The Case Management Conference is continued from January 12, 2016
5
to March 1, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor at 450 Golden
6
Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102;
7
8
2. The initial disclosures between the parties will be exchanged on
February 18, 2016; and
9
3. Counsel will schedule a Rule 26(f) conference and ADR on or before
10
February 11, 2016 and file their ADR certification on February 11,
11
2016.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
DATED: December 22, 2015
15
Judge William H. Orrick
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
32
3
CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?