Levi Strauss & Co., v. Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc.

Filing 25

STIPULATION TO 1) CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RULE 26 DISCLOSURES 2) EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 3) WITHDRAW PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS; AND ORDER THEREON re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CA SE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT - Case Management Conference set for 5/10/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco (Case Management Statement due by 5/3/2016). Motion Hearing (as to Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint to be filed 2/19/2016) set for 3/30/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/22/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY (SBN 99666) MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8500 Facsimile: (415) 984-8599 TFlaherty@mpplaw.com Attorneys for Defendant AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 STIPULATION TO 1) CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RULE 26 DISCLOSURES 2) EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 3) WITHDRAW PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS; AND ORDER THEREON Plaintiff, v. 14 15 Case No. 15-cv-04718-WHO LEVI STRAUSS & CO., AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 Judge: 18 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc. (“Aqua Dynamics”) and Levi Strauss & Co. (“Levi’s”) entered into a stipulation to extend time for Aqua Dynamics to respond to the complaint and the Court entered its order thereon dated December 7, 2015; (Docket No. 13). WHEREAS Aqua Dynamics has filed a motion to dismiss Levi’s complaint or 24 25 26 in the alternative stay the action pending arbitration and that motion is scheduled to be heard on February 10, 2016 (Docket No. 14); WHEREAS Levi’s filed a First Amended Complaint on January 4, 2016 27 28 30 31 32 William H. Orrick (Docket No. 22); I135188 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 WHEREAS Levi’s filed opposition to the Motion to Dismiss but Aqua Dynamics has not yet filed its reply to that opposition (Docket No. 23); WHEREAS, Aqua Dynamics contends this court does not have subject matter jurisdiction of the First Amended Complaint or this Action and intends to file a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint and the parties desire to enter into a stipulation setting forth a briefing schedule and hearing date for that motion; WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to continue the Case Management Conference and Rule 26 Disclosures to dates after the Court ruled on a Motion to Dismiss and desire to do so again (Docket No. 20); WHEREAS, in order to conserve client and court resources pending Aqua Dynamics’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, the parties wish to continue the status conference scheduled for March 1, 2016 and continue the deadlines relating to Rule 26(f) conference and ADR disclosures; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed between the parties as follows: 1. The motion of Aqua Dynamics to dismiss the complaint set for hearing on February 10, 2016 is withdrawn. The parties have met and conferred and agree to a briefing schedule on any motion filed by Aqua Dynamics in response to the First Amended Complaint as follows: 19  Motion filing February 19, 2016 20  Opposition due March 4, 2016 21  Reply due March 11, 2016 22  Hearing March 30, 2016 23 24 25 26 2. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 1, 2016 be continued to May 10, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.; 3. The Rule 26(f) conference and ADR certification is continued to April 14, 2016; 27 28 30 31 32 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO 1 2 3 4 5 4. The initial disclosures will be exchanged between the parties on April 28, 2016; Nothing in this stipulation affects LS&Co.'s ability to seek provisional relief in this matter, and neither party shall use this extension period as the basis for any argument in this or any other matter pending between the parties. 6 DATED: January 21, 2016 HANSON BRIDGETT 7 By: /s/Robert A. McFarlane Robert A. McFarlane Attorneys for Plaintiff LEVI STRAUSS & CO. 8 9 10 11 DATED: January 21, 2016 MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP 12 By: /s/Timothy M. Flaherty Timothy M. Flaherty Attorneys appearing specially for Defendant AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC. 13 14 15 16 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(1)-(3), Timothy M. Flaherty hereby attests that 17 all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the 18 filing’s content and have authorized the filing of this document. 19 MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP 20 By: /s/Timothy M. Flaherty Timothy M. Flaherty 21 22 23 ORDER 24 The court having considered the Stipulation of the parties and good cause 25 appearing, orders as follows: 26 1. Aqua Dynamics Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint shall be 27 filed on or before February 19, 2016; Levi’s opposition brief shall be due 28 30 31 32 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 March 4, 2016; Aqua Dynamics’ reply brief shall be due on March 11, 2016; 2. Hearing on Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint shall be March 30, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 3. The Case Management Conference is continued from March 1, 2016 to May 10, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102; 4. Counsel will schedule a Rule 26(f) conference and file their ADR certification on or before April 14, 2016; 5. The initial disclosures will be exchanged between the parties on April 28, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 DATED: January 22, 2016 Judge William H. Orrick 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO.: 15-CV-04718-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?