Levi Strauss & Co., v. Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc.
Filing
29
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING HEARING FOR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - 26 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order will be treated as a motion for preliminary injunction. Response due by 3/2/2016. Reply due by 3/9/2016. Motion Hearing set for 3/30/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/16/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,
Case No. 15-cv-04718-WHO
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
AND SETTING HEARING FOR
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
Re: Dkt. No. 26
12
Plaintiff’s ill-timed motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. It waived any
13
claim of emergency: the arbitration it seeks to stop was demanded on September 15, 2015, was
14
commenced by JAMS on December 23, 2015, and had arbitrators selected by January 22, 2016,
15
yet plaintiff waited until the afternoon of February 12, 2016 to seek a TRO. Nor is any emergency
16
apparent. The motion mentions no impending hearing date. The only apparent threatened damage
17
is that JAMS wants payment for the arbitrators; money damages do not constitute irreparable
18
injury.
19
The motion will be treated as a motion for a preliminary injunction and will be heard on
20
March 30, 2016, along with defendant’s motion to dismiss. Defendant may file an opposition on
21
March 2, 2016, and plaintiff may reply on March 9, 2016.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 16, 2016
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?