Momoh v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Stipulation to Extend to Respond to 15 Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015)

1 Stuart Price, Esq. (SBN:150439)
Price Law Group, APC
2 15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 800
3 Encino, CA 91436
Tel: [phone]
4 [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff,
5 Ramat B. Momoh
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 RAMAT B. MOMOH
9
10

Plaintiff,
vs.

11 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
12

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-04729-HSG
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT.
Motion Filed: November 23, 2015
Motion Hearing: January 28, 2016

13
14 / / /
15 / / /
16 / / /
17 / / /
18 / / /
19 / / /
20 / / /
21 / / /
22

The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Extend the Time to Respond to

23 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed by Plaintiff RAMAT B. MAMOH
24 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (“Defendant”), and
25 finding good cause therein, hereby orders as follows:
26
1.
The December 7, 2015 responsive pleading deadline is vacated and
27 continued to December 16, 2015, and any reply continued to December 30, 2105.
28

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

December 7
2 DATED: _______________, 2015

3
4
5

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2