Blue v. Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING 25 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2016)

1 S. BRETT SUTTON 143107
JARED HAGUE 251517
2 JOSEPH V. MACIAS 273168
SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION, P.C.
3
6715 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 216
4 Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
5
Attorneys for PLAINTIFF
6
7
8
9
10
11

J. KEVIN LILLY, Bar No. 119981
SHANNON R. BOYCE, Bar No. 229041
RACHAEL LAVI, Bar No. 294443
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
2049 Century Park East, Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]

12 Attorneys for DEFENDANT
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14
15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

* * *

17 PATRICIA BLUE, an individual,

Case No. 3:15-cv-04786-WHA

18

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup

19

Plaintiff,
vs.

CLASS ACTION

20
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING
21 COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive,
22
23

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendant.

24
25

Action Filed:
Trial Date:

26

July 24, 2015
April 10, 2017

27
Sutton Hague
Law Corporation
6715 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 216
FRESNO, CA 93704

28
1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Plaintiff PATRICIA BLUE (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record, and

2 Defendant BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC. (“Defendant”), by and
3 through its counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
5

RECITALS AND JOINT STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Plaintiff desires to file a Second Amended Complaint and has provided

6 Defendant with a copy of the proposed Second Amended Complaint;
7

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant have conferred in good faith;

8

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:

9

1.

Plaintiff may have leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, a true and correct

10 copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
11

2.

Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint will be deemed filed and served as of the

12 date of the Court’s Order approving this Stipulation.
13

3.

Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #1-4) will be

14 deemed Defendant’s Answer to the Second Amended Complaint.
15
16 DATED: February 2, 2016
/s/ S. Brett Sutton
S. BRETT SUTTON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PATRICIA BLUE

17
18
19
20 DATED: February 2, 2016
21
22
23

/s/ Shannon R. Boyce
SHANNON R. BOYCE
Attorneys for Defendant
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING
COMMUNITIES, INC.

24
25
26
27
Sutton Hague
Law Corporation
6715 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 216
FRESNO, CA 93704

28
2
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based on the above Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS

3 HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
4

1.

Plaintiff is granted leave to file her Second Amended Complaint, a true and

5 correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
6

2.

Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is deemed filed and served upon entry of

7 this Order.
8

3.

Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #1-4) is

9 deemed Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, and is deemed filed and
10 served upon entry of this Order.
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
February 8, 2016.
14 DATED: _________________

________________________________________

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Sutton Hague
Law Corporation
6715 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 216
FRESNO, CA 93704

28
3
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER