Balsam Brands Inc. et al v. Cinmar, LLC et al

Filing 100

ORDER granting #99 Administrative Motion. Reply Claim Construction Brief is August 23, 2016. The Claim Construction Hearing is reset for 8/29/2016 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/22/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

MARC N. BERNSTEIN (SBN 145837)
[e-mail]
WILL B. FITTON (SBN 182818)
[e-mail]
ANDREW Y. PIATNICIA (SBN 174691)
[e-mail]
THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP, P.C.
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1650
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.283.4804

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BALSAM BRANDS INC. and
BALSAM INTERNATIONAL UNLIMITED COMPANY

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

BALSAM BRANDS INC., a Delaware
corporation, and BALSAM
INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, an Ireland
limited company,
Plaintiffs,
v.

CINMAR, LLC d/b/a FRONTGATE and
GRANDIN ROAD, a Delaware limited
liability company, and FRONTGATE
MARKETING, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

Case No. 3:15-CV-04829-WHO

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION UNDER CIVIL L.R. 7-11
FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING
PLAINTIFFS ONE ADDITIONAL
DAY TO FILE REPLY CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
Hon. William H. Orrick
Hearing: August 29, 2016 9:00 a.m.

Defendants.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN MOTION RE: REPLY

Case No. 15-cv-04829-WHO

1

Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion under Civil L.R. 7-11

2

for an Order Permitting Plaintiffs One Additional Day to File Their Reply Claim

4

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file

3
5
6
7

Construction Brief, any responses thereto, and for good cause shown, it is hereby
their Reply Claim Construction Brief is August 23, 2016.

The claim construction hearing is reset to 2:00 p.m. on August 29, 2016.

8
9

10
11
12

22
DATED: August _____, 2016

_______________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN MOTION RE: REPLY

Case No.15-cv-04829-WHO