Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Illinois Union Insurance Company et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS (DEFENDANT ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANYS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT) filed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 23, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 ALLEN RUBY (SBN 47109) RAOUL D. KENNEDY (SBN 40892) 2 JAMES P. SCHAEFER (SBN 250417) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 3 525 University Avenue, Suite 1400 Palo Alto, CA 94301 4 Telephone: (650) 470-4500 Facsimile: (650) 470-4570 5 allen.ruby@skadden.com raoul.kennedy@skadden.com 6 james.schaefer@skadden.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., 13 14 CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-4834-JST Plaintiff, v. 15 ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; 16 NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., a New York corporation, 17 Defendants. 18 19 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS (DEFENDANT ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT); and [PROPOSED] ORDER. Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: February 11, 2016 2:00 p.m. 9, 19th Floor Hon. Jon S. Tigar 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND TIME RE: ILLINOIS UNION’S MTD CASE NO. 3:15-CV-4834-JST 1 Plaintiff Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (“Intuitive”) and Defendant Illinois Union Insurance 2 Company (“Illinois Union”) jointly stipulate, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, 3 to extend the time to file any opposition and reply briefs regarding Illinois Union’s Motion to 4 Dismiss Complaint (Dkt. 16) (the “Motion to Dismiss”). 5 WHEREAS, on December 21, 2015, Illinois Union filed its Motion to Dismiss and set the 6 motion for hearing on February 11, 2016; 7 WHEREAS, as currently scheduled, Intuitive’s opposition to Illinois Union’s Motion to 8 Dismiss would be due January 4, 2016 and Illinois Union’s reply would be due January 11, 2016; 9 WHEREAS, given the pending holidays, Intuitive requested a one-week extension to 10 respond to Illinois Union’s Motion to Dismiss, to which Illinois Union agreed; 11 Now therefore, the parties, through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 12 • that the deadline for filing any opposition to Illinois Union’s Motion to Dismiss be 13 extended to January 11, 2016; and 14 • that the deadline for filing any reply in support of Illinois Union’s Motion to 15 Dismiss be extended to January 25, 2016. 16 DATED: December 22, 2015 17 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 18 19 By: 20 21 /s/ James Schaefer Attorneys for Plaintiff INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. COZEN O’CONNOR 22 23 By: 24 /s/ Charles Wheeler Attorneys for Defendant ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY 25 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this 26 document has been obtained from the signatories above. 27 /s/ James P. Schaefer 28 JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND TIME RE: ILLINOIS UNION’S MTD CASE NO. 3:15-CV-4834-JST 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS 3 ORDERED THAT: 7 2. the deadline for filing any reply in support of Illinois Union’s Motion to Dismiss be extended to January 25, 2016. December 23 10 DATED: __________________, 2015 S UNIT ED 9 RT U O 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA ERED O ORD ___________________________________ IT IS S 11 NO The Honorable Jon. S. Tigar United States District .CourtaJudge S Ti g r 12 RT 13 J u d ge J o 14 15 A H ER n R NIA 6 January 11, 2016; and FO 5 1. the deadline for filing any opposition to Illinois Union’s Motion to Dismiss be extended to LI 4 N D IS T IC T R OF C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME RE: ILLINOIS UNION’S MTD 771308-LACSR02A - MSW CASE NO. 3:15-CV-4834-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?