Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. et al

Filing 70

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The initial case management conference is continued to November 18, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/11/16. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Frank E. Scherkenbach (SBN 142549) scherkenbach@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. One Marina Park Drive Boston, MA 02110-2804 Tel: (617) 542-5070 ** Fax: (617) 542-8906 4 5 6 7 8 9 Howard G. Pollack (SBN 162897) pollack@fr.com Michael R. Headley (SBN 220834) headley@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Tel: (650) 839-5070 ** Fax: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Plaintiff POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. 10 11 12 13 15 16 Additional counsel listed on signature page 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 18 19 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Blair M. Jacobs (admitted pro hac vice) blairjacobs@paulhastings.com Christina A, Ondrick (admitted pro hac vice) christinaondrick@paulhastings.com Charles J. Hawkins (admitted pro hac vice) charleshawkins@paulhastings.com Patrick J. Stafford (admitted pro hac vice) patrickstafford@paulhastings.com PAUL HASTINGS LLP 875 15th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 551-1700 ** Fax: (202) 551-1705 Attorneys for Defendants FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION 14 20 Erik R. Puknys (SBN 190926) erik.puknys@finnegan.com Justin A. Hendrix (SBN 301057) justin.hendrix@finnegan.com Ming Wai Choy (SBN 306189) ming.choy@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel: (650) 849-6600 ** Fax: (650) 849-6666 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:15-cv-04854-MMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION, a Taiwanese corporation, Defendants. 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 3:15-cv-04854-MMC 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, by and among 2 Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. (“Power Integrations”) and Defendants Fairchild Semiconductor 3 International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corp., and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp. (collectively, 4 “Fairchild”), as follows: 5 Since the time of the prior hearing on August 26, 2016, the parties have continued to discuss 6 the possibility of staying the instant lawsuit to stage the resolution of their pending disputes. The 7 parties have not yet been able to finalize a specific plan at this time, but they are making progress in 8 that regard since Fairchild’s acquisition by ON Semiconductor was completed on September 19, 9 2016. As such, the parties respectfully stipulate and request, subject to the Court’s approval, that 10 the case management conference currently scheduled for Oct. 14, 2016 be rescheduled to November 11 18, 2016, to permit the parties to continue their discussions. The parties believe this will make the 12 most efficient use of both the Court’s and the parties’ resources, and the parties will be in a position 13 to submit an updated status report and joint case management conference statement to the Court no 14 later than November 11, 2016. 15 The only prior modifications to the Court’s schedule in this case have been to accommodate 16 a scheduling conflict for Fairchild’s counsel and to provide Power Integrations more time to 17 evaluate Fairchild’s counterclaims (Dkt. No. 59) and to extend the initial case management 18 conference to permit the parties to evaluate the possibility of a stay and the import of Fairchild’s 19 acquisition (Dkt. No. 68). 20 21 22 Given the early stage of this case, the requested time modification will not have any impact on the schedule for this case. THEREFORE, Power Integrations and Fairchild stipulate and respectfully request that the 23 Court reschedule the initial case management conference to November 18, 2016. 24 Dated: October 7, 2016 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Michael R. Headley Michael R. Headley 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 3:15-cv-04854-MMC 1 Dated: October 7, 2016 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 2 By: /s/ Erik R. Puknys Erik R. Puknys 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Additional counsel: Attorneys for Defendants FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION Yar R. Chaikovsky (SBN 175421 / yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 1117 S. California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel; 650-320-1800 ** Fax: 650-320-1900 E. Robert Yoches (admitted pro hac vice / bob.yoches@finnegan.com) Gerald F. Ivey (admitted pro hac vice / gerald.ivey@finnegan.com) J. Preston Long (admitted pro hac vice / j.preston.long@finnegan.com) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 901 New York Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Tel: 202-408-4000 ** Fax: 202-408-4400 I hereby attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has 17 been obtained from counsel for Defendants. 18 Dated: October 7, 2016 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 19 20 By: /s/ Michael R. Headley Michael R. Headley 21 Attorneys for Plaintiff POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. 22 23 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: ___________, 2016 October 11 By: _______________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 3:15-cv-04854-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?