Kunsberg v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company

Filing 9

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 8 Stipulation of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. Anna M. Martin – CSBN 154279 amartin@rimacmartin.com 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Telephone: (415) 561-8440 Facsimile: (415) 561-8430 Attorneys for Defendant CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Brian H. Kim (State Bar No. 215492) James P. Keenley (State Bar No. 253106) Emily A. Bolt (State Bar No. 253109) BOLT KEENLEY KIM LLP 1010 Grayson Street, Suite Three Berkeley, California 94710 Phone: (510) 225-0696 Fax: (510) 225-1095 Attorneys for Plaintiff PAUL KUNSBERG 14 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 PAUL KUNSBERG, 19 20 Plaintiff, v. 21 22 23 24 CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff PAUL KUNSBERG and 2 CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY by and through their counsel of 3 record herein, that the captioned action may be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant 4 to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 5 The parties shall bear their own respective attorney fees and costs of suit. 6 Counsel for the filing party hereby attests that concurrence in filing of this document has 7 been obtained by each of the other signatories to this document. The conformed signature 8 herein shall serve in lieu of their original signatures on this document. Upon order of the Court, 9 this filing party shall produce records which support the concurrence of all signatories to this 10 document. 11 12 13 RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. 14 15 DATED: January 11, 2016 By: /s/ Anna M. Martin ANNA M. MARTIN Attorneys for Defendant CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY DATED: January 11, 2016 By: /s/ Brian H. Kim____ BRIAN H. KIM Attorney for Plaintiff PAUL KUNSBERG 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: January 11, 2016 4 5 ________________________________ Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 3 4 5 I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1051 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, California 94115. On January 11, 2016, the following document is being filed electronically and will be available for viewing and downloading from the Court’s CM/ECF system: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 6 7 8 9 10 11 The Notice of Electronic Case Filing Automatically generated by the system and sent to all parties entitled to service under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Northern District of California, who have consented to electronic service shall constitute service of the filed document to all such parties. Executed on January 11, 2016 at San Francisco, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct. 12 13 14 Fatima Bonilla (Type or print name) /s/ Fatima Bonilla (Signature) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?