Kunsberg v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Filing
9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 8 Stipulation of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.
Anna M. Martin – CSBN 154279
amartin@rimacmartin.com
1051 Divisadero Street
San Francisco, CA 94115
Telephone: (415) 561-8440
Facsimile: (415) 561-8430
Attorneys for Defendant
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Brian H. Kim (State Bar No. 215492)
James P. Keenley (State Bar No. 253106)
Emily A. Bolt (State Bar No. 253109)
BOLT KEENLEY KIM LLP
1010 Grayson Street, Suite Three
Berkeley, California 94710
Phone: (510) 225-0696
Fax: (510) 225-1095
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PAUL KUNSBERG
14
15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
PAUL KUNSBERG,
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
21
22
23
24
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff PAUL KUNSBERG and
2
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY by and through their counsel of
3
record herein, that the captioned action may be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant
4
to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
5
The parties shall bear their own respective attorney fees and costs of suit.
6
Counsel for the filing party hereby attests that concurrence in filing of this document has
7
been obtained by each of the other signatories to this document. The conformed signature
8
herein shall serve in lieu of their original signatures on this document. Upon order of the Court,
9
this filing party shall produce records which support the concurrence of all signatories to this
10
document.
11
12
13
RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.
14
15
DATED: January 11, 2016
By:
/s/ Anna M. Martin
ANNA M. MARTIN
Attorneys for Defendant
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
DATED: January 11, 2016
By:
/s/ Brian H. Kim____
BRIAN H. KIM
Attorney for Plaintiff
PAUL KUNSBERG
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: January 11, 2016
4
5
________________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
3
4
5
I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of
18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1051 Divisadero Street, San
Francisco, California 94115.
On January 11, 2016, the following document is being filed electronically and will be
available for viewing and downloading from the Court’s CM/ECF system:
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
6
7
8
9
10
11
The Notice of Electronic Case Filing Automatically generated by the system and sent to
all parties entitled to service under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of
the United States District Court, Northern District of California, who have consented to
electronic service shall constitute service of the filed document to all such parties.
Executed on January 11, 2016 at San Francisco, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar
of this Court at whose direction the service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct.
12
13
14
Fatima Bonilla
(Type or print name)
/s/ Fatima Bonilla
(Signature)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:15-cv-04860-MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?