Natalie Sramek v. California Highway Patrol et al

Filing 13

ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO RESPOND Status Report due by 6/6/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/3/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

NATALIE SRAMEK,

Case No. 15-cv-04873-HSG

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES
TO RESPOND

9
10

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 12

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Plaintiff,

13

Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 16

v.

14
15

Case No. 15-cv-05199-HSG

LEAH VOGT,

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18
19

On May 13, 2016, the parties filed a joint status report asking the Court to allow additional

20

time for settlement discussions and waive existing deadlines related to filing, serving, and

21

answering the complaint. Dkt. No. 11. The parties informed the Court that they would file a

22

further joint status report on or about June 1, 2016. Id. On May 17, 2016, the Court directed the

23

parties to file a joint status report of no more than two pages on or before June 1, 2016. Dkt. No.

24

12. The deadline to file a further joint status report has passed, and the parties did not file the

25

required status report.

26
//
27
28

//

1
2

The Court hereby DIRECTS the parties to file a further joint status report of no more than
two pages within 3 days of this Order.

3
4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 6/3/2016
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2