Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Last Chance Buys, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 26 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697 E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com Nicole L. Drey, SBN: 250235 E-mail: ndrey@johnsonpham.com Hung Q. Pham, SBN: 276613 E-mail: ppham@johnsonpham.com 6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 888-7540 Facsimile: (818) 888-7544 Attorneys for Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES Richard E. Quintilone II, SBN: 200995 E-mail: req@quintlaw.com Alvin B. Lindsay, SBN: 220236 E-mail: abl@quintlaw.com 22974 El Toro Road, Suite 100 Lake Forest, California 92630 Telephone: (949) 458-9675 Facsimile: (949) 458-9679 Attorney for Defendants LAST CHANCE BUYS, INC. OLUWATOSIN AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AERIN 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:15-cv-05038-HSG STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. LAST CHANCE BUYS, INC., a Florida Corporation; OLUWATOSIN AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AERIN, an Individual; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Current Date: Proposed Date: 3/1/2016 3/29/2016 Defendants. 26 27 Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED (“Plaintiff”), through its counsel of 28 record, and Defendants LAST CHANCE BUYS, INC., and OLUWATOSIN AJIBOYE a/k/a -1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC – Case No. 3:15-cv-05038-HSG 1 ZOE AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AERIN (collectively “Defendants”), through their counsel of record, 2 hereby stipulate and request that the Case Management Conference set for March 1, 2016, be 3 continued to March 15, 2016, or a date thereafter convenient to the Court. 4 On February 2, 2016, the Court held an initial Case Management Conference, at which 5 time no trial or pretrial dates were set. At that time, the Parties represented that they were in the 6 midst of settlement discussions, but Plaintiff was awaiting additional documentation from 7 Defendants. Defendants’ counsel represented that the documents would be produced within two 8 weeks, and the Court then continued the Case Management Conference to March 1, 2016, to give 9 the Parties time to produce and review these additional documents and potentially resolve this 10 matter without further intervention from the Court. 11 Defendants, however, were delayed in producing these additional documents and did not 12 do so until Saturday, February 20, 2016. Plaintiff was unable to download and begin reviewing 13 the hundreds of pages of documents until Monday, February 22, 2016. Plaintiff is diligently 14 reviewing the multitudes of documents, but it is unlikely that any meaningful settlement 15 discussions will be able to be had prior to the deadline to file an updated Case Management 16 Statement, which is February 23, 2016. 17 18 19 /// 20 21 22 /// 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC – Case No. 3:15-cv-05038-HSG 1 Therefore, the Parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the 2 Case Management Conference to March 29, 2016, or a date thereafter convenient to the Court’s 3 calendar. 4 DATED: February 22, 2016 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP 5 By: /s/ Nicole L. Drey Nicole L. Drey, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED 6 7 8 DATED: February 22, 2016 QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES 9 By: /s/ Alvin B. Lindsay Alvin B. Lindsay, Esq. Attorney for Defendants LAST CHANCE BUYS, INC. OLUWATOSIN AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AERIN 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation, the Case Management Conference set for March 1, 2016, is hereby continued to March 29, 2016. 18 19 20 DATED: February 25, 2016 ______________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC – Case No. 3:15-cv-05038-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?