Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Last Chance Buys, Inc. et al
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 26 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP
Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697
E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com
Nicole L. Drey, SBN: 250235
E-mail: ndrey@johnsonpham.com
Hung Q. Pham, SBN: 276613
E-mail: ppham@johnsonpham.com
6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326
Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone:
(818) 888-7540
Facsimile:
(818) 888-7544
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES
Richard E. Quintilone II, SBN: 200995
E-mail: req@quintlaw.com
Alvin B. Lindsay, SBN: 220236
E-mail: abl@quintlaw.com
22974 El Toro Road, Suite 100
Lake Forest, California 92630
Telephone:
(949) 458-9675
Facsimile:
(949) 458-9679
Attorney for Defendants
LAST CHANCE BUYS, INC.
OLUWATOSIN AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AERIN
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 3:15-cv-05038-HSG
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
LAST CHANCE BUYS, INC., a Florida
Corporation; OLUWATOSIN AJIBOYE a/k/a
ZOE AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AERIN, an
Individual; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive,
Current Date:
Proposed Date:
3/1/2016
3/29/2016
Defendants.
26
27
Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED (“Plaintiff”), through its counsel of
28
record, and Defendants LAST CHANCE BUYS, INC., and OLUWATOSIN AJIBOYE a/k/a
-1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC – Case No. 3:15-cv-05038-HSG
1
ZOE AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AERIN (collectively “Defendants”), through their counsel of record,
2
hereby stipulate and request that the Case Management Conference set for March 1, 2016, be
3
continued to March 15, 2016, or a date thereafter convenient to the Court.
4
On February 2, 2016, the Court held an initial Case Management Conference, at which
5
time no trial or pretrial dates were set. At that time, the Parties represented that they were in the
6
midst of settlement discussions, but Plaintiff was awaiting additional documentation from
7
Defendants. Defendants’ counsel represented that the documents would be produced within two
8
weeks, and the Court then continued the Case Management Conference to March 1, 2016, to give
9
the Parties time to produce and review these additional documents and potentially resolve this
10
matter without further intervention from the Court.
11
Defendants, however, were delayed in producing these additional documents and did not
12
do so until Saturday, February 20, 2016. Plaintiff was unable to download and begin reviewing
13
the hundreds of pages of documents until Monday, February 22, 2016. Plaintiff is diligently
14
reviewing the multitudes of documents, but it is unlikely that any meaningful settlement
15
discussions will be able to be had prior to the deadline to file an updated Case Management
16
Statement, which is February 23, 2016.
17
18
19
///
20
21
22
///
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC – Case No. 3:15-cv-05038-HSG
1
Therefore, the Parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the
2
Case Management Conference to March 29, 2016, or a date thereafter convenient to the Court’s
3
calendar.
4
DATED: February 22, 2016
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP
5
By: /s/ Nicole L. Drey
Nicole L. Drey, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
6
7
8
DATED: February 22, 2016
QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES
9
By: /s/ Alvin B. Lindsay
Alvin B. Lindsay, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
LAST CHANCE BUYS, INC.
OLUWATOSIN AJIBOYE a/k/a ZOE AJIBOYE
a/k/a ZOE AERIN
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
Pursuant to Stipulation, the Case Management Conference set for March 1, 2016, is
hereby continued to March 29, 2016.
18
19
20
DATED: February 25, 2016
______________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC – Case No. 3:15-cv-05038-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?