Chunn v. United States District Court

Filing 7

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/25/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 WALTER CHUNN, No. C 15-5040 MEJ (PR) 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Defendant ____________________________________/ On November 3, 2015, plaintiff, an inmate at the Solano County Jail, filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. The same day, the clerk of the Court notified plaintiff that his application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) was not complete in that it did not include a certificate of funds completed and signed by a prison official or a trust account statement showing transactions and balances for the last six months. (Docket No. 3.) On November 19, 2015, plaintiff filed a certificate of funds, but it was still missing the required trust account statement. (Docket No. 6.) In the interest of justice, the Court will grant plaintiff an extension of time to file the missing document, i.e., a copy of his prisoner trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months, no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date this order is filed. In the alternative, plaintiff may pay the full $400.00 filing fee. Failure to respond in accordance with this order in the time provided may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee without further notice to plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 DATED: February 25, 2016 Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?