Chunn v. United States District Court
Filing
7
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/25/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
WALTER CHUNN,
No. C 15-5040 MEJ (PR)
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
v.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
Defendant
____________________________________/
On November 3, 2015, plaintiff, an inmate at the Solano County Jail, filed a pro se
petition for a writ of mandamus. The same day, the clerk of the Court notified plaintiff that his
application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) was not complete in that it did not include a
certificate of funds completed and signed by a prison official or a trust account statement
showing transactions and balances for the last six months. (Docket No. 3.) On November 19,
2015, plaintiff filed a certificate of funds, but it was still missing the required trust account
statement. (Docket No. 6.)
In the interest of justice, the Court will grant plaintiff an extension of time to file the
missing document, i.e., a copy of his prisoner trust account statement showing transactions for
the last six months, no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date this order is filed. In the
alternative, plaintiff may pay the full $400.00 filing fee.
Failure to respond in accordance with this order in the time provided may result in
dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee without further
notice to plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
DATED:
February 25, 2016
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?