Scott Johnson v. SSR Group, Inc. et al

Filing 19

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, DKT. NO. 16 . The parties are ORDERED to complete the joint inspection and meet and confer process pursuant to General Order 56. All briefing on Defendant's Motion is STAYED and the 2/25/2016 hearing is VACATED. Parties to file joint status report. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 1/25/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 15-cv-05094-MEJ Plaintiff, 8 ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS v. Re: Dkt. No. 16 9 10 SSR GROUP, INC., Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On January 20, 2016, Defendant SSR Group, Inc. filed a Motion to Dismiss, arguing that 14 Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s ADA claims have been rendered moot by Defendant’s elimination of the 15 access barriers identified in his Complaint. Prior to consideration of Defendant’s motion, the 16 Court finds it would be beneficial for the parties to meet and confer in an attempt to resolve this 17 matter informally pursuant to General Order 56. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to 18 complete the initial disclosures, joint inspection of premises, and meet and confer requirements of 19 General Order 56. The parties shall file a joint status report within seven days of completion of 20 these requirements. The February 25, 2016 hearing on Defendant’s motion is VACATED and all 21 briefing deadlines under Civil Local Rule 7 are STAYED pending the outcome of the meet and 22 confer process. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 25, 2016 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?