Morris v. SolarCity Corp.

Filing 80

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' 76 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL re 78 . Defendant's opposition due 8/2/16; plaintiffs' reply due 8/9/16. The noticed hearing date of 9/1/16 at 1:30 p.m. will not change. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/27/2016. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP
Karl S. Kronenberger (CA Bar No. 226112)
Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (CA Bar No. 222187)
150 Post Street, Suite 520
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Lead Genesis, Inc.

8
9
10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17

GEORGE MORRIS, JOSE ALBINO
LUCERO JR. and DAVID HALL, on
behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

18
19
20
21
22

v.

Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL

SOLARCITY CORP. and LEAD
GENESIS, INC.,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

Plaintiffs George Morris, Jose Albino Lucero Jr., and David Hall (“Plaintiffs”) and

2

Defendant Lead Genesis, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel,

3

stipulate that briefing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Appointment of Interim Class Counsel, filed

4

on July 12, 2016, shall proceed as follows, subject to the Court’s approval:

5

1. Defendant’s opposition shall be due on August 2, 2016.

6

2. Plaintiffs’ reply shall be due on August 9, 2016.

7

3. The noticed hearing date of September 1, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. will not change.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

9
10

Respectfully submitted,

11

DATED: July 26, 2016

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP

12
By:

13
14

s/ Jeffery M. Rosenfeld
Jeffery M. Rosenfeld

____

Attorneys for Defendant Lead Genesis, Inc.

15
16

DATED: July 26, 2016

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

17
By:

18

s/ Joshua D. Arisohn___________
Joshua D. Arisohn

19
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

20
21

DATED: July 26, 2016

NATHAN & ASSOCIATES, APC

22
By:

23
24

s/ Reuben D. Nathan___________
Reuben D. Nathan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS

1

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

July 27
Dated: _____________, 2016

5

__________________________________

6

THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG

7

United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS

2

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1
2
3
4
5

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall
serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

6

s/ Jeffery M. Rosenfeld___________
Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS

3

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE