Sawyer v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

Filing 42

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup granting 41 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) W. TUCKER PAGE (Cal. State Bar No. 306728) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com tuckerpage@paulhastings.com 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 TODD SAWYER, an individual, 19 20 21 Plaintiff, No. 3:15-cv-05109-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE vs. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, 22 Defendants. Judge: Dept.: Hon. William H. Alsup 8 Complaint Filed: Trial Date: February 6, 2015 May 15, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 3:15-cv-05109-WHA LEGAL_US_W # 87367387.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side 3 4 to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. Dated: October 17, 2016. . William H. Alsup United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 3:15-cv-05109-WHA LEGAL_US_W # 87367387.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?