Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.

Filing 172

Order by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part #171 Discovery Letter Brief.(jsclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RAEF LAWSON, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No.15-cv-05128-JSC ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER v. Re: Dkt. No. 171 GRUBHUB, INC., et al., Defendants. 12 13 The Court is in receipt of a joint discovery letter brief submitted by Plaintiff Rael Lawson 14 and Defendants Grubhub Holdings Inc. and Grubhub Inc. (together, “Grubhub”) concerning a 15 number of pretrial matters. (Dkt. No. 171.) 16 17 Having reviewed the joint discovery letter brief the Court orders the following: 1. The parties should organize the trial exhibits such that each document is a separate 18 exhibit. The parties shall not bundle several documents into one exhibit. 19 2. Grubhub must explain to Plaintiff how it conducted its search for documents 20 concerning complaints made by other drivers regarding the accuracy of Grubhub’s 21 time records, in particular what search terms were used. 22 3. If Mr. Kelly testifies at trial, he must be made available for a deposition in San 23 Francisco within two weeks of this order. The Court will address Plaintiff’s charts 24 and the deposition and testimony of Plaintiff’s paralegal at the pretrial conference 25 on August 24, 2017. 26 4. The Court will address Grubhub’s ROGS concerning Plaintiff’s tax information 27 and whether Plaintiff should be ordered to respond at the pretrial conference on 28 August 24, 2017. 1 2 The telephonic discovery hearing scheduled for Monday August 21, 2017 at 11 a.m. is VACATED. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18, 2017 6 7 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?