Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
Filing
172
Order by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part #171 Discovery Letter Brief.(jsclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RAEF LAWSON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No.15-cv-05128-JSC
ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 171
GRUBHUB, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
The Court is in receipt of a joint discovery letter brief submitted by Plaintiff Rael Lawson
14
and Defendants Grubhub Holdings Inc. and Grubhub Inc. (together, “Grubhub”) concerning a
15
number of pretrial matters. (Dkt. No. 171.)
16
17
Having reviewed the joint discovery letter brief the Court orders the following:
1. The parties should organize the trial exhibits such that each document is a separate
18
exhibit. The parties shall not bundle several documents into one exhibit.
19
2. Grubhub must explain to Plaintiff how it conducted its search for documents
20
concerning complaints made by other drivers regarding the accuracy of Grubhub’s
21
time records, in particular what search terms were used.
22
3. If Mr. Kelly testifies at trial, he must be made available for a deposition in San
23
Francisco within two weeks of this order. The Court will address Plaintiff’s charts
24
and the deposition and testimony of Plaintiff’s paralegal at the pretrial conference
25
on August 24, 2017.
26
4. The Court will address Grubhub’s ROGS concerning Plaintiff’s tax information
27
and whether Plaintiff should be ordered to respond at the pretrial conference on
28
August 24, 2017.
1
2
The telephonic discovery hearing scheduled for Monday August 21, 2017 at 11 a.m. is
VACATED.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 18, 2017
6
7
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?