Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER granting #34 Stipulation re: CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, STAY ALL PAGA CLAIMS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, filed by Andrew Tan, Raef Lawson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 2/10/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433
[e-mail]
JUSTIN T. GOODWIN, SBN 278721
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
Attorneys for Defendants GRUBHUB HOLDINGS
INC. and GRUBHUB INC.

9
10

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac
vice
[e-mail]
THOMAS FOWLER, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
TELEPHONE: [phone]
Facsimile: 617.994.5801
MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
[e-mail]
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs ANDREW TAN
and RAEF LAWSON, in their capacity
as Private Attorney General
Representatives, and RAEF LAWSON, on
behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated

11
12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19

ANDREW TAN and RAEF LAWSON in their
capacities as Private Attorney General
Representatives, and RAEF LAWSON,
individually and on behalf of all other similarly
situated individuals,

20
Plaintiffs,
21
v.
22
23
24
25

GRUBHUB HOLDINGS INC. and
GRUBHUB INC.,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-05128-JSC
STIPULATION REGARDING
CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, STAY ALL PAGA
CLAIMS AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
ACTION FILED: September 23, 2015
[Removal from the Superior Court of the State of
California in and for San Francisco County,
Case No. CGC-15-548103]

26
27
28

STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE
NO. 3:15-CV-05128-JSC

1
2
3

Plaintiffs Andrew Tan and Raef Lawson and Defendants GrubHub Holdings Inc. and
GrubHub Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as
follows:

4
5
6

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Or,
Alternatively, Stay All PAGA Claims (the “Motion”) on January 29, 2016, noticed for a hearing on
March 8, 2016;

7
8
9

WHEREAS, on February 3, 2016, the Court issued a briefing schedule setting February 12,
2016 as the deadline for responses to Defendants’ Motion, February 19, 2016 as the deadline for
replies, and March 10, 2016 as the hearing date;

10
11

WHEREAS, on February 3, 2016, the Court continued the Case Management Conference
from February 11, 2016 to March 31, 2016;

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are not available to attend a hearing on March 8, 2016 or March 10,
2016;
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and Defendants do not oppose Plaintiffs’ request to
continue the hearing date for Defendants’ Motion;
WHEREAS, the parties are not seeking a continuance of the Opposition and Reply deadlines;
WHEREAS, both parties are available to attend the hearing on Defendants’ Motion on March
24, 2016, if that date is convenient for the Court; and
WHEREAS, if the Court continues the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to March 24, 2016, the
parties agree that the Case Management Conference should be continued from March 31, 2016 to
April 14, 2016 (maintaining the 21-day interval between the Motion hearing and the Case
Management Conference in the current schedule).
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT the deadline for Plaintiffs to file
their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion shall be set as February 12, 2016, the deadline for
Defendants to file their Reply in support of the Motion shall be set as February 19, 2016, the hearing
on the Motion shall be continued to March 24, 2016, and the Case Management Conference shall be
continued to April 14, 2016.

28
2
STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE
NO. 3:15-CV-05128-JSC

1

Dated: February 8, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

2
3
4

Respectfully submitted,

5

ANDREW TAN and RAEF LAWSON, in their capacity
as Private Attorney General Representatives, and RAEF
LAWSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, PLAINTIFFS

6
7

By their attorneys,
8
/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan, pro hac vice
Thomas Fowler, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
[phone]
Email: [e-mail], [e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13
14

Matthew Carlson (SBN 273242)
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]

15
16
17
18
19

GRUBHUB HOLDINGS INC. and GRUBHUB
INC., DEFENDANTS,

20
21

By their attorneys,
22
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
23
Dated: February 10, 2016

H

E

cquelin

Corley

R NIA

e Scott

Attorneys for Defendants GRUBHUB HOLDINGS
INC. and GRUBHUB INC.

FO

RT

Judge Ja

LI

TED

GRAN

NO

28

UNIT
ED

27

By: /s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Dhananjay S. Manthripragada

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

26

S

25

A

24

3

C
RN
STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE
F
D IS T IC T O
NO. 3:15-CV-05128-JSC
R