Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co. Inc. et al
Filing
53
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/12/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2017)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
LEOPOLDO PENA MENDOZA, ELVIZ
SANCHEZ AND JOSE ARMANDO
CORTES,
) Case Number: 15-CV-05143-WHO
)
) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
) HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
v.
)
)
FONSECA McELROY GRINDING CO. INC. )
)
and GRANITE ROCK COMPANY;
)
)
Defendants.
)
.
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Based on the stipulation and good cause found, the Court hereby Orders Adjudicates and
Decrees as Follows:
Count Three of the First Amended Complaint is Dismissed with Prejudice as to all
Defendants;
As to Counts One, Two and Three, the parties have reached a resolution as to all claims other
than those encompassed by this Court’s November 28, 2016 Order Granting Partial Summary
Judgment, in favor of Defendant Granite Rock Company on Plaintiffs’ prevailing wage claims
that lowbed transportation work hours are public work subject to California prevailing wage
requirements pursuant to California Labor Code section 1720 et seq..
As a result, let a Judgment be entered on behalf of Defendant GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
as against Plaintiffs LEOPOLDO PENA MENDOZA, ELVIZ SANCHEZ and JOSE
{30234-11 00399837.DOCX 1 }
1
ARMANDO CORTES on Counts One, Two and Three of the First Amended Complaint as the
2
Court has found that prevailing wages are not owed for what is termed “lowbed mobilization”
3
and the parties have resolved all other disputes that fall outside the Court’s November 28, 2016
4
Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED AND DECREED.
7
8
9
Dated: January 12, 2017
10
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{30234-11 00399837.DOCX 1 }
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?