Dytch v. Saleh et al
Filing
20
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER FOR CASES ASSERTING DENIAL OF RIGHT OF ACCESS UNDER AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TITLE II & III (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131- 89). Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/1/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ALBERT DYTCH,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
JERRY F. CARIVEAU, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:15-cv-05180-LB
AMENDED SCHEDULING
ORDER FOR CASES ASSERTING
DENIAL OF RIGHT OF ACCESS
UNDER AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT TITLE II & III
(42 U.S.C. §§ 12131- 89)
16
17
At the hearing on March 31, 2016, all parties appeared, and the plaintiff withdrew the default-
18
judgment motion at ECF No. 14. The court directs the parties to confer about the time for all
19
defendants to file a responsive pleading and for Mr. Odtallah (the actual restaurant owner) to
20
accept service. The court provided the defendants with a copy of the handbook for parties
21
representing themselves, and information about the court’s helpdesk. The court also orders the
22
plaintiff to serve on all other parties a copy of this order and the assigned judge’s pertinent
23
Standing Orders. This case is otherwise exempt from Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel and parties
24
must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the court otherwise orders.
25
26
27
28
ORDER (No.3:15-cv-05180-LB)
CASE SCHEDULE
1
2
Date
Event
Governing Rule
3
11/12/2015
Complaint Filed
4
4/21/2016
Last day for plaintiff to complete service on defendants
or file motion for administrative relief from deadline
General Order 56;
Civil L.R.7-11
5
6
7
7 days before Last day for parties to complete initial disclosures,
Joint Site
including defendant's disclosure re: construction or
Inspection
alteration history of subject premises
8
6/7/2016
9
FRCivP 26(a);
General Order 56 ¶2;
Last day for parties and counsel to hold joint inspection General Order 56 ¶3,4;
of premises, with or without meet-and-confer regarding
settlement
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
28 days after
Last day for parties to meet and confer in person to
Joint Site
discuss settlement
Inspection
42 days after Last day for plaintiff to file "Notice of Need for
Joint Site
Mediation"
Inspection
7 calendar
days after
mediation
Last day for plaintiff to file Motion for Administrative
Relief Requesting Case Management Conference
General Order 56 ¶4;
General Order 56 ¶7;
General Order 56 ¶8;
Civil L.R . 7-11
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 1, 2016
______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER (No. 3:15-cv-05180-LB)
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
ALBERT DYTCH,
Case No. 3:15-cv-05180-LB
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
JERRY F. CARIVEAU, et al.,
Defendants.
8
9
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
That on April 1, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Hasan Odtallah
10168 Foothill Blvd.
Oakland, CA 94605
Jerry F. Cariveau
962 Saint Bede Lane
Hayward, CA 94544
Remedios Rodriguez
962 Saint Bede Lane
Hayward, CA 94544
Dated: April 1, 2016
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
By:________________________
Lashanda Scott, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable LAUREL BEELER
26
27
28
ORDER (No. 3:15-cv-05180-LB)
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?