Cotter v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
24
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/10/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
WILLIAM G. MALCOLM #129271
BRIAN S. THOMLEY #275132
MALCOLM ♦ CISNEROS
A Law Corporation
2112 Business Center Drive
Irvine, California 92612
Telephone:
(949) 252-9400
Facsimile:
(949) 252-1032
E-FILED: 12/04/2015
Attorneys for Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and M&T Bank
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO COURTHOUSE
10
CYNTHIA COTTER,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:15-cv-05204-LB
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO
STATE COURT
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
M&T Bank, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
LLC and DOES 1-100,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Having reviewed the Stipulation to Remand Case to State Court (“Stipulation”), and
19
good cause appearing therefore,
20
IT IS ORDERED that:
21
1.
The Stipulation is approved, and this matter shall be remanded to Alameda
22
Superior Court without prejudice to defendants’ right to have the matter removed to federal
23
court again should it become removable in the future.
24
2.
The motion to dismiss filed by defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. set for
25
January 7, 2016 shall be taken off calendar without prejudice and renewable should the matter
26
later be removed back to federal court.
27
28
3.
The Case Management Conference currently set for February 11, 2016 shall be
vacated.
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
Dated:
December 10, 2015
_____________________________
HON. LAUREL BEELER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?