Herndon v. Judge Sutro et al
Filing
7
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE 6 IFP APPLICATION. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 12/2/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
GERROD LONZELL HERNDON,
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Case No. 15-cv-05230-HSG (PR)
v.
JUDGE SUTRO, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE
IFP APPLICATION
Defendants.
14
15
16
On October 29, 2015, plaintiff, an inmate at the Sacramento County Jail, filed this pro se
17
civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Eastern
18
District of California. The Eastern District thereafter transferred the action to this District. On
19
November 16, 2015, the Clerk notified plaintiff that his application to proceed in forma pauperis
20
(“IFP”) was not complete in that it did not include a certificate of funds completed and signed by a
21
prison official or a trust account statement showing transactions and balances for the last six
22
months. On November 27, 2015, plaintiff filed another IFP application, but it was still missing the
23
required forms. Specifically, in the signature line of the certificate of funds is written “c/o” in
24
what appears to be plaintiff’s handwriting. And plaintiff again failed to submit a trust account
25
statement.
26
In the interest of justice, the Court will grant plaintiff an extension of time to file the
27
missing certificate of funds and prison trust account statement, no later than thirty (30) days from
28
the date this order is filed. In the alternative, plaintiff may pay the full $400.00 filing fee.
1
Failure to respond in accordance with this order in the time provided may result in
2
dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee without further notice
3
to plaintiff.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 12/2/2015
6
________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?