Fieser v. Van Ness et al
Filing
27
ORDER OF RECUSAL RE CASE NO. 15-cv-5429-HSG AND ORDER RESCINDING RELATED CASE ORDER RE CASE NOS. 15-cv-3425-HSG and 15-cv-5236-HSG. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/24/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JEFFREY CSOKA,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 13 & 17
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
JOSEPH F. MARKETTE,
15
v.
XOMA CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
DEBORAH A. FIESER,
20
21
Related Case No. 15-cv-05236-HSG
Plaintiff,
18
19
Lead Case No. 15-cv-03425-HSG
Plaintiff,
13
14
ORDER OF RECUSAL AND ORDER
RESCINDING RELATED CASE ORDER
JOHN W VARIAN, et al.,
11
12
Related Case No. 15-cv-05429-HSG
v.
W. DENMAN VAN NESS, et al.,
Defendants.
22
23
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
24
I, the undersigned judge of the court, finding myself disqualified in Csoka v. Varian, Case
25
No. 3:15-cv-05429, hereby recuse myself from this case and request that the case be reassigned
26
pursuant to the provisions of paragraph E.2 of the Assignment Plan.
27
28
The Court hereby rescinds its order relating this case to Markette v. Xoma Corp., Case No.
3:15-cv-3425, and Fieser v. Van Ness, Case No. 4:15-cv-05236. The Markette and Fieser cases
1
2
will remain assigned to the undersigned judge.
All pending dates of motions, pretrial conferences and trial in the Csoka case are hereby
3
vacated and will be reset by the newly assigned judge. This includes the parties’ stipulation to
4
extend time for defendants to respond to complaint and reschedule case management conference,
5
Dkt. No. 17.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 22, 2016
24,
8
9
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?