Stevenson v. Jones

Filing 45


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES L. STEVENSON, Plaintiff, 8 M. JONES, Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 9 10 Case No. 15-cv-05241-SI Re: Dkt. No. 44 12 13 On May 30, 2017, the court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and 14 entered judgment against plaintiff. On June 14, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion to alter or amend the 15 judgment, which the court construed to be a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), 16 and denied the motion. Plaintiff now returns with a document labeled as an “opposition to motion 17 to dismiss, motion for leave to amend opposition to summary of judgments.” Docket No. 44. The 18 motion offers no new evidence and instead is just further unconvincing argument against 19 defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s motion to amend his opposition to the 20 already-granted motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Docket No. 44. IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?