DeWitt v. Ryan et al

Filing 22

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT by Hon. William Alsup denying 21 .(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2016) Modified on 3/14/2016 (dtmS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TIMOTHY A. DEWITT, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 No. C 15-05261 WHA Plaintiff, v. HON. PAUL RYAN, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, CALIFORNIA CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION, a California agency, ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of the State of California, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Former Governor of the State of California, an individual, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States, and DOES 1 through 100, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. / An order sua sponte dismissed all of plaintiff’s claims. That order allowed plaintiff to 22 seek leave to amend only his sixth claim for vote dilution. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave 23 to amend, but his proposed amended complaint still includes all of his claims, which have been 24 dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his complaint is 25 hereby DENIED. Plaintiff may seek leave to file an amended complaint that only states his sixth 26 claim with the proposed amendments and the relevant prayer for relief within FOURTEEN 27 28 1 CALENDAR DAYS of this order. Plaintiff’s proposed second amended complaint should omit any 2 parties against whom no claim is asserted. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: February 16, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?