Varnes v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 11, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK VARNES

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC
Plaintiff(s),

v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE C.
Defendant(s).
/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline

Dated: February 10, 2016

Dated: February 10, 2016

/s/ Julia Campins
Attorney for Plaintiff
Mark Varnes
/s/ Jordan S. Altura
Attorney for Defendant
Aetna Life Insurance Company

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com

[PROPOSED] ORDER
X

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2016
UNITED STATES

JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com