Varnes v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Filing 31

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE (ADR LOCAL RULE 6-5); ORDER. The deadline to complete mediation is extended to May 19, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 13, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JORDAN S. ALTURA (SBN: 209431) TINO X. DO (SBN: 221346) GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 6 7 8 9 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 JULIA CAMPINS (SBN 238023) HILLARY BENHAM-BAKER (SBN 265019) CAMPINS BENHAM-BAKER, LLP 935 Moraga Road, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94549 Tel. (415) 373-5333 Fax (415) 373-5334 julia@cbbllp.com hillary@cbbllp.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant MARK VARNES 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 MARK VARNES 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 vs. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 22 Defendant. 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE (ADR LOCAL RULE 6-5); [PROPOSED] ORDER Hon. Maxine M. Chesney Complaint Filed: November 18, 2015 TIPU 25 26 27 28 -1Case No. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE; ORDER 1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 2 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Mark Varnes (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant/Counter-Claimant 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) (collectively, “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to conduct mediation pursuant to the Court’s ADR Local Rule 6; WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to hold the mediation by the presumptive deadline of ninety (90) days from the date of the Court’s Order referring the case to mediation; WHEREAS, on February 10, 2016, the Court issued an order for the Parties to conduct mediation pursuant to their stipulation; WHEREAS, the Parties’ deadline to complete the mediation is May 10, 2016; 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 10 WHEREAS, Geoffrey White has been assigned as mediator in this matter; 12 WHEREAS, the earliest the Parties and Mr. White could agree to conduct mediation is 13 14 15 May 19, 2016 due to their respective schedules; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Aetna through their respective counsel of record to extend the deadline to complete mediation to May 19, 2016. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 Dated: April 12, 2016 CAMPINS BENHAM-BAKER, LLP 19 By /s/ Julia Campins Julia Campins Hillary Benham-Baker Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant MARK VARNES 20 21 22 23 Dated: April 12, 2016 GORDON & REES LLP 24 25 26 27 28 By /s/ Jordan S. Altura Jordan S. Altura Tino X. Do Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY -2Case No. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE; ORDER 1 2 3 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE I, Jordan S. Altura , am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this. Joint Stipulation to Extend Mediation Completion Deadline. In compliance with Local Rule 51(i), I hereby attest thatJulia Campins, counsel for Plaintiff Mark Varnes, has concurred in this filing. 4 Dated: April 12, 2016 5 /s/ Jordan S. Altura Jordan S. Altura 6 7 8 9 10 ORDER Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 13 The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation, and good cause appearing, finds that the deadline for the parties to complete mediation should be extended to May 19, 2016. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 Dated: April 13, 2016 _________________________________________ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge 19 20 21 1112452/27571205v.1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1101030/21976909v.1 -3Case No. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE; ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?