Varnes v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
Filing
31
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE (ADR LOCAL RULE 6-5); ORDER. The deadline to complete mediation is extended to May 19, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 13, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
JORDAN S. ALTURA (SBN: 209431)
TINO X. DO (SBN: 221346)
GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
6
7
8
9
10
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
11
12
JULIA CAMPINS (SBN 238023)
HILLARY BENHAM-BAKER (SBN 265019)
CAMPINS BENHAM-BAKER, LLP
935 Moraga Road, Suite 200
San Francisco, CA 94549
Tel. (415) 373-5333
Fax (415) 373-5334
julia@cbbllp.com
hillary@cbbllp.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
MARK VARNES
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
MARK VARNES
19
Plaintiff,
20
21
vs.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
22
Defendant.
23
24
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO
EXTEND MEDIATION
COMPLETION DEADLINE (ADR
LOCAL RULE 6-5); [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
Complaint Filed: November 18, 2015
TIPU
25
26
27
28
-1Case No. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE; ORDER
1
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
2
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Mark Varnes (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant/Counter-Claimant
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) (collectively, “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to conduct mediation pursuant to the Court’s ADR
Local Rule 6;
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to hold the mediation by the presumptive deadline of
ninety (90) days from the date of the Court’s Order referring the case to mediation;
WHEREAS, on February 10, 2016, the Court issued an order for the Parties to conduct
mediation pursuant to their stipulation;
WHEREAS, the Parties’ deadline to complete the mediation is May 10, 2016;
11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
10
WHEREAS, Geoffrey White has been assigned as mediator in this matter;
12
WHEREAS, the earliest the Parties and Mr. White could agree to conduct mediation is
13
14
15
May 19, 2016 due to their respective schedules;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Aetna through their
respective counsel of record to extend the deadline to complete mediation to May 19, 2016.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED
17
Respectfully submitted,
18
Dated: April 12, 2016
CAMPINS BENHAM-BAKER, LLP
19
By
/s/ Julia Campins
Julia Campins
Hillary Benham-Baker
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
MARK VARNES
20
21
22
23
Dated: April 12, 2016
GORDON & REES LLP
24
25
26
27
28
By /s/ Jordan S. Altura
Jordan S. Altura
Tino X. Do
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
-2Case No. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE; ORDER
1
2
3
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, Jordan S. Altura , am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this.
Joint Stipulation to Extend Mediation Completion Deadline. In compliance with Local Rule 51(i), I hereby attest thatJulia Campins, counsel for Plaintiff Mark Varnes, has concurred in this
filing.
4
Dated: April 12, 2016
5
/s/ Jordan S. Altura
Jordan S. Altura
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
11
12
13
The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation, and good cause appearing, finds
that the deadline for the parties to complete mediation should be extended to May 19, 2016.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
Dated: April 13, 2016
_________________________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge
19
20
21
1112452/27571205v.1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1101030/21976909v.1
-3Case No. 3:15-cv-05269-MMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?