Provost v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 40

ORDER GRANTING 39 STIPULATED DISMISSAL.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com jullielal@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com 12 13 14 15 REGAN A.W. HERALD (Cal. State Bar No. 251879) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 875 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 551-1700 Facsimile: (202) 551-1705 reganherald@paulhastings.com 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 RUBY PROVOST, 22 No. 3:15-CV-05280-WHA Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 23 vs. Judge: Hon. William Alsup 24 25 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 26 Defendants. 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. No. 3:15-CV-05280-WHA LEGAL_US_W # 86456576.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims and this action shall be and hereby are 3 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 Dated: July 25, 2016. . Hon. William Alsup United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. No. 3:15-CV-05280-WHA LEGAL_US_W # 86456576.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?