Provost v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING 39 STIPULATED DISMISSAL.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
7
8
9
10
11
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-3441
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
jullielal@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paulhastings.com
12
13
14
15
REGAN A.W. HERALD (Cal. State Bar No. 251879)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
875 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 551-1700
Facsimile: (202) 551-1705
reganherald@paulhastings.com
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
RUBY PROVOST,
22
No. 3:15-CV-05280-WHA
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
23
vs.
Judge: Hon. William Alsup
24
25
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
26
Defendants.
27
28
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. No. 3:15-CV-05280-WHA
LEGAL_US_W # 86456576.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims and this action shall be and hereby are
3
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
Dated: July 25, 2016.
.
Hon. William Alsup
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. No. 3:15-CV-05280-WHA
LEGAL_US_W # 86456576.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?