Fredenberg et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING 35 STIPULATION DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF CLINTON FREDENBERG.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Clinton Fredenberg, Freeman Fong and Pamela Mallory
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-3441
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
jullielal@paulhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
CLINTON FREDENBERG, FREEMAN
FONG and PAMELA MALLORY,
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
22
23
vs.
No. 3:15-CV-05291-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
WITH PREJUDICE CLAIMS OF
PLAINTIFF CLINTON FREDENBERG
Judge:
Dept.:
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Honorable William H. Alsup
8
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
April 13, 2015
May 15, 2017
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF
U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. No. 3:15-CV-05291-WHA
LEGAL_US_W # 86002782.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Clinton Fredenberg’s claims only may be and hereby are
3
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect
4
to those claims.
5
6
Dated:
June 6, 2016.
.
William H. Alsup
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF
U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. No. 3:15-CV-05291-WHA
LEGAL_US_W # 86002782.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?