Fredenberg et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

Filing 42

ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF PAMELA MALLORY.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 10 11 JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com jullielal@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 CLINTON FREDENBERG, FREEMAN FONG and PAMELA MALLORY, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 21 22 vs. No. 3:15-CV-05291-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF PAMELA MALLORY Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 23 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. No. 3:15-CV-05291-WHA LEGAL_US_W # 86002782.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Pamela Mallory’s claims only may be and hereby are 3 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect 4 to those claims. 5 6 Dated: August 2, 2016. . William H. Alsup United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. No. 3:15-CV-05291-WHA LEGAL_US_W # 86002782.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?