Sharon Robinson v. Wells Fargo Advisors, et al

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 32 Stipulation Continuing Hearing Date and Revising Briefing Schedule on Motion for Summary Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2016)

1
2

JAMES M. BRADEN (SBN 102397)
LAW OFFICES OF JAMES M. BRADEN
44 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 1210
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

3
4

TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]
EMAIL:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ROBERT TODD SULLWOLD (SBN 88139)
SULLWOLD & HUGHES
1999 HARRISON STREET, 18TH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CA 94612
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: 415-762-5338
EMAIL: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

SHARON ROBINSON, an individual

Case No. 4:15-CV-05304-HSG

18
Plaintiff,

19
20

v.

21

WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, a Delaware
Limited Liability Company; WELLS FARGO
& COMPANY, a Delaware corporation;
WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association,
and DOES 1-25 inclusive,

22
23
24
25

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE
AND REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Current Hearing Date: June 30, 2016
Proposed New Hearing Date: July 21, 2016
Time: 2:00 PM
Courtroom: 15 on 18th Floor

Defendants.
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

26
27
28

1
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1
2
3

(1) Hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment brought by Defendants Wells Fargo &
Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, is now set for Thursday, June 30, 2016.
(2) Plaintiff Sharon Robinson’s Opposition to that Motion is now due to be filed by

4

Thursday, June 9. Defendants’ Reply in support of their Motion is now due to be filed by

5

Thursday, June 16.

6

(3) At the request of Plaintiff’s counsel, and with the agreement of Defendants’ counsel,

7

the parties hereby stipulate that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion shall be continued for three

8

weeks, i.e. to Thursday, July 21. The parties also stipulate that the additional three weeks of

9

time before the hearing shall be allocated so that the Court is not prejudiced by any reduction in

10

the two weeks it will have to review the completed papers, and that Plaintiff shall have two of

11

those three weeks as extended time, and Defendants shall have one of those three weeks as

12

extended time.

13

(4) Accordingly, the parties stipulate that Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion shall be

14

filed by Thursday, June 23, and that Defendants’ Reply in support of their Motion shall be filed

15

by Thursday, July 7.

16
17

(5) The parties request that the Court confirm this Stipulation by making
it an Order of the Court, by signature on the next page.

18
19

Dated: June 6, 2016

20

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES M. BRADEN

21

By:_____/s/ James Braden___________________
James Braden

22

Attorney for Plaintiff Sharon Robinson

23

Dated: June 6, 2016

SULLWOLD & HUGHES

24
25
26

By: _____/s/_Robert Todd Sullwold______
Robert Todd Sullwold

27
28

2
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Attorneys for Defendants Wells Fargo & Company
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

1
2

ORDER

3
4
5

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

6

The foregoing Stipulation of the parties is hereby made an Order of this Court.

7
8
9

Dated: June 7 2016

_______________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT