Sharon Robinson v. Wells Fargo Advisors, et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 34 Stipulation For Continuance of Hearing Date and Revised Briefing Schedule on Defendants' 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2016)

1
2

JAMES M. BRADEN (SBN 102397)
LAW OFFICES OF JAMES M. BRADEN
44 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 1210
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

3
4

TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]
EMAIL:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ROBERT TODD SULLWOLD (SBN 88139)
SULLWOLD & HUGHES
1999 HARRISON STREET, 18TH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CA 94612
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: 415-762-5338
EMAIL: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

SHARON ROBINSON, an individual

Case No. 4:15-CV-05304-HSG

18
Plaintiff,

19
20

v.

21

WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, a Delaware
Limited Liability Company; WELLS FARGO
& COMPANY, a Delaware corporation;
WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association,
and DOES 1-25 inclusive,

22
23
24
25

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE
AND REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Current Hearing Date: July 21, 2016
Proposed New Hearing Date: Aug. 4, 2016
Time: 2:00 PM
Courtroom: 15 on 18th Floor

Defendants.
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

26
27
28

1
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1
2
3

(1) Hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment brought by Defendants Wells Fargo &
Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, is now set for Thursday, July 21, 2016.
(2) Plaintiff Sharon Robinson’s Opposition to that Motion is now due to be filed by

4

Thursday, June 23, 2016. Defendants’ Reply in support of their Motion is now due to be filed

5

by Thursday, July 7, 2016.

6

(3) At the request of Plaintiff’s counsel, and with the agreement of Defendants’ counsel,

7

the parties hereby stipulate that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion shall be continued for two

8

weeks, i.e. to Thursday, August 4, 2015. The parties also stipulate that the additional two weeks

9

of time before the hearing shall be allocated so that the Court is not prejudiced by any reduction

10

in the two weeks it will have to review the completed papers, and that Plaintiff shall have 12

11

days of those two weeks as extended time, and Defendants shall have two days of those two

12

weeks as extended time.

13

(4) Accordingly, the parties stipulate that Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion shall be

14

filed by Tuesday, July 5, 2016, and that Defendants’ Reply in support of their Motion shall be

15

filed by Thursday, July 21, 2016.

16
17

(5) The parties request that the Court confirm this Stipulation by making
it an Order of the Court, by signature on the next page.

18
19

Dated: June 20, 2016

20

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES M. BRADEN

21

By:_____/s/ James Braden___________________
James Braden

22

Attorney for Plaintiff Sharon Robinson

23

Dated: June 20, 2016

SULLWOLD & HUGHES

24
25
26

By: _____/s/_Robert Todd Sullwold______
Robert Todd Sullwold

27
28

2
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Attorneys for Defendants Wells Fargo & Company
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

1
2

ORDER

3
4
5

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

6

The foregoing Stipulation of the parties is hereby made an Order of this Court.

7
8
9

Dated: June 28, 2016

_______________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT