Geray v. Muniz
Filing
6
ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 1/7/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JASON GERAY,
Case No. 15-cv-05354-VC
(PR)
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW
CAUSE
v.
9
10
WILLIAM MUNIZ,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 5
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Petitioner Jason Geray, a state inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison, files this pro se
petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. His motions for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis are granted.
Geray’s claim is that “state documents” contain false information that he escaped from
Atascadero State Hospital on April 15, 2009. In support of his contention that the “documents”
are false, Geray submits a February 26, 2010 probation report indicating that, on April 15, 2009,
he was remanded back from Atascadero State Hospital. His petition also indicates that, on August
8, 2008, he was convicted of use of a deadly weapon and, on November 29, 2010, he was
20
sentenced to 19 years.
21
From the face of the petition it is unclear how Geray states a claim that is cognizable in a
22
federal habeas corpus proceeding. A federal court may entertain a habeas petition from a state
23
24
25
26
27
28
prisoner “only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or
treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). The fact that the documents may incorrectly
state that Geray escaped from Atascadero does not appear to have given rise to a state conviction
or sentence. Therefore, he is not in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of
the United States based on this allegedly false information. However, if his sentence was
1
2
3
4
5
increased or if he lost good time credits because of the false information, he may be able to state a
cognizable habeas claim.
Therefore, Geray is ordered to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed for
failure to state a cognizable habeas claim by filing with the Court a short statement, within twentyeight days from the date of this Order, indicating whether he was convicted of a crime, whether his
sentence was increased or whether he lost good time credits because of the allegedly false
6
information. If Geray does not file a statement within this time frame, his petition shall be
7
dismissed with prejudice.
8
This Order terminates docket numbers 3 and 5.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 7, 2016
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JASON GERAY,
Case No. 15-cv-05354-VC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
WILLIAM MUNIZ,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on January 7, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
18
19
20
Jason Geray ID: AF4262
Salinas Valley State Prison D-4-217
PO Box 1020
Soledad, CA 93960
21
22
Dated: January 7, 2016
23
24
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
25
26
27
28
By:________________________
Kristen Melen, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable VINCE CHHABRIA
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?