Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) PTE. LTD. v. Acer Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) PTE. LTD. filed by Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) PTE. LTD. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/5/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL
IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05427-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
ACER INC. and ACER AMERICA
CORP.,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
X
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
☐
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
X
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
☐
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:_1/4/2016____
__/s/ David E. Sipiora____________
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:_1/4/2016____
__/s/ Craig Kaufman (with permission)____
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
R NIA
UNIT
ED
n
M. Che
__________________________________
Edward
Judge
RT
FO
January 5, 2016
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
NO
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
DISTRICT
LI
x
☐
☐
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A
H
ER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?