Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) PTE. LTD. v. Acer Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) PTE. LTD. filed by Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) PTE. LTD. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/5/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., Plaintiff(s), v. CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05427-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ACER INC. and ACER AMERICA CORP., Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: ☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: X the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) ☐ other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:_1/4/2016____ __/s/ David E. Sipiora____________ Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:_1/4/2016____ __/s/ Craig Kaufman (with permission)____ Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER R NIA UNIT ED n M. Che __________________________________ Edward Judge RT FO January 5, 2016 D RDERE OO IT IS S NO Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. DISTRICT LI x ☐ ☐ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE A H ER N F D IS T IC T O R C When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?