Google Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Incorporated et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 46 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Google Inc. filed by Google Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 18, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Google Inc. , Plaintiff(s), v. Eolas Technologies Inc. 15-cv-05446-JST CASE NO. ______________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS , Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: To be mutually agreed on Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ by the parties. _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 90 days from the issuance of a Markman order in this case. other requested deadline _____________________________________________ February 17, 2016 Dated:___________ February 17, 2016 Dated:____________ /s David A. Perlson ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff /s John B. Campbell ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant *Eolas makes this filing without waiving at least its arguments and challenges in its motion to dismiss (Dkt. 37). CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER UNIT ED R NIA DERED O OR IT IS S __________________________________ UNITED STATES S. Tigar n JUDGE A H ER FO RT J u d ge J o LI February 18, 2016 NO Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. N F D IS T IC T O R C When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?