Google Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Incorporated et al
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 46 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Google Inc. filed by Google Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 18, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Google Inc.
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Eolas Technologies Inc.
15-cv-05446-JST
CASE NO. ______________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
To be mutually agreed on
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
by the parties.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
90 days from the issuance of a Markman order in this case.
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
February 17, 2016
Dated:___________
February 17, 2016
Dated:____________
/s David A. Perlson
____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s John B. Campbell
____________________________
Attorney for Defendant
*Eolas makes this filing without waiving at least its arguments and
challenges in its motion to dismiss (Dkt. 37).
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
UNIT
ED
R NIA
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
__________________________________
UNITED STATES S. Tigar
n JUDGE
A
H
ER
FO
RT
J u d ge J o
LI
February 18, 2016
NO
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?