Google Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Incorporated et al
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 JOINT STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Eolas Technologies Incorporated's Motion to Dismiss Google Inc.'s Complaint (Dkt. 37) filed by Google Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 23, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2016)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
2
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No.
170151)
3
David A. Perlson (Cal. Bar No. 209502)
Michael D. Powell (Cal. Bar No. 202850)
4
Derek J. Tang (Cal. Bar No. 4540514)
Lindsay M. Cooper (Cal. Bar No. 287125)
5
Felipe Corredor (Cal. Bar No. 295692)
qe-eolas@quinnemanuel.com
6 50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
7 (415) 875-6600
(415) 875-6700 facsimile
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff Google Inc.
9
Jennifer P. Estremera, SBN 251076
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Tel: (650) 394-1414; Fax: (650) 394-1422
jestremera@mckoolsmith.com
John B. Campbell, TX SBN 24036314
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 West 6th Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
Tel. (512) 692-8700; Fax: (512) 692-8744
jcampbell@mckoolsmith.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Eolas Technologies Incorporated
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
GOOGLE INC.,
Case No. 3:15-cv-05446-JST
16
Plaintiff,
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
19 INCORPORATED,
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO EOLAS
TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED’S
MOTION TO DISMISS GOOGLE INC.’S
COMPLAINT
20
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
17
v.
18
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. :15-cv-05446-JST
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”) and
2 Defendant Eolas Technologies Incorporated (“Eolas”), by and through their respective attorneys,
3 hereby submit the following Joint Stipulation, as follows:
4
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2015, Google served its complaint upon Eolas;
5
WHEREAS, on December 4, 2015, this Court set the Case Management Conference for
6 February 23, 2016;
7
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline
8 for Eolas to answer or otherwise respond to Google’s complaint to January 21, 2016;
9
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2016, this Court granted the parties’ stipulation;
10
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2016, Google filed a first amended complaint;
11
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2016, this Court reset the Case Management Conference for
12 February 24, 2016;
13
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Eolas filed a motion to dismiss Google’s complaint,
14 scheduled for hearing by this Court on April 21, 2016;
15
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Eolas filed an administrative motion for relief from the
16 notice and order setting initial Case Management Conference, for continuance of the Case
17 Management Conference, and to stay any discovery;
18
WHEREAS, on February 17, 2016, this Court granted in part and denied in part Eolas’s
19 administrative motion, resetting the Case Management Conference for April 21, 2016;
20
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agreed to extend Google’s time to oppose
21 Eolas’s motion to dismiss Google’s complaint, currently set for February 22, 2016, and Eolas’s
22 time to file a reply in support of said motion to dismiss, currently set for February 29, 2016;
23
WHEREAS, no other deadlines will be affected;
24
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY
25 REQUEST that the deadline for Google to respond to Eolas’s motion to dismiss be extended by
26 eleven days to March 4, 2016, and that the deadline for Eolas to reply be extended to March 14,
27 2016.
28
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. :15-cv-05446-JST
1 DATED: February 22, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
2
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
3
By /s David A. Perlson
David A. Perlson
Attorneys for Google Inc.
4
5
6
McKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
7
By /s John B. Campbell
John B. Campbell
Attorneys for Eolas Technologies Incorporated
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. :15-cv-05446-JST
1
2
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I, David A. Perlson, am the ECF user whose userid and password authorized the filing
3 of this document. Under Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that John B. Campbell has concurred in
4 this filing.
5
DATED: February 22, 2016
/s/ David A. Perlson
David A. Perlson
6
7
8
9
[PROPOSED] ORDER
10
11
Plaintiff Google Inc. and Defendant Eolas Technologies Incorporated have stipulated to
12 extend the deadline for Google’s opposition to Eolas’s motion to dismiss Google’s complaint until
13 March 4, 2016 and the deadline for Eolas’s reply until March 14, 2016.
14
The requested extension is GRANTED. Google’s opposition to Eolas’s motion to dismiss
15 Google’s complaint will be filed no later than March 4, 2016, and Eolas’s reply will be filed no
16 later than March 14, 2016.
17
18
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
February 23
DATED: ___________________, 2016
21
22
23
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
-4JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. :15-cv-05446-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?