Google Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Incorporated et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 55 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time to Reply to Google Inc.'s Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 8, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016)

1
2
3

Jennifer P. Estremera, SBN 251076
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

John B. Campbell, TX SBN 24036314
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
James E. Quigley, TX SBN 24075810
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 West 6th Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
Tel. [phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No.
170151)
David A. Perlson (Cal. Bar No. 209502)
Michael D. Powell (Cal. Bar No. 202850)
Derek J. Tang (Cal. Bar No. 4540514)
Lindsay M. Cooper (Cal. Bar No. 287125)
Felipe Corredor (Cal. Bar No. 295692)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
[phone]
[phone] facsimile
Attorneys for Plaintiff Google Inc.

Attorneys for Defendant
Eolas Technologies Incorporated

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
AUSTIN, TX

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
GOOGLE INC.,
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED,
18
Defendant.
19
20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:15-cv-05446-JST
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO REPLY TO GOOGLE
INC.’S RESPONSE TO EOLAS
TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED’S MOTION TO
DISMISS GOOGLE INC.’S
COMPLAINT
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Defendant Eolas Technologies Incorporated

2

(“Eolas”) and Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby

3

submit the following Joint Stipulation, as follows:

4

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2015, Google served its complaint upon Eolas;

5

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2015, this Court set the Case Management Conference for

6

February 23, 2016;

7
8

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for
Eolas to answer or otherwise respond to Google’s complaint to January 21, 2016;

9

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2016, this Court granted the parties’ stipulation;

10

WHEREAS, on January 20, 2016, Google filed a first amended complaint;

11

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2016, this Court reset the Case Management Conference for

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
AUSTIN, TX

12

February 24, 2016;

13
14

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Eolas filed a motion to dismiss Google’s complaint,
scheduled for hearing by this Court on April 21, 2016;

15

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Eolas filed an administrative motion for relief from the

16

notice and order setting initial Case Management Conference, for continuance of the Case

17

Management Conference, and to stay any discovery;

18
19

WHEREAS, on February 17, 2016, this Court granted in part and denied in part Eolas’s
administrative motion, resetting the Case Management Conference for April 21, 2016;

20

WHEREAS on February 22, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for

21

Google to respond to Eolas’s motion to dismiss Google’s complaint to March 4, 2016, and for Eolas

22

to file its reply to Google’s response to March 14, 2016;

23
24

WHEREAS on February 23, 2016, this Court granted the parties’ February 22, 2016
stipulation;

25

WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agreed to extend Eolas’s time to reply to

26

Google’s response to Eolas’s motion to dismiss Google’s complaint, currently set for March 14,

27

2016;

28

WHEREAS, no other deadlines will be affected;
-1CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST
McKool 1162781v1

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY

2

REQUEST that the deadline for Eolas to respond to Google’s response to Eolas’s motion to dismiss

3

be extended by three days to March 17, 2016.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
AUSTIN, TX

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST
McKool 1162781v1

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

DATED: March 7, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

2

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

3

By /s James E. Quigley
James E. Quigley
Attorneys for Eolas Technologies Incorporated

4
5

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
6
By /s David A. Perlson
David A. Perlson
Attorneys for Google Inc.

7
8
9
10
11

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
AUSTIN, TX

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST
McKool 1162781v1

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1
2
3
4

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I, James E. Quigley, am the ECF user whose userid and password authorized the filing of this
document. Under Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that David A. Perlson has concurred in this filing.
DATED: March 7, 2016

/s/ James E. Quigley

5
6
7
8
[PROPOSED] ORDER

9

Defendant Eolas Technologies Incorporated and Plaintiff Google Inc. have stipulated to

11

extend the deadline for Eolas’s reply to Google’s response to Eolas’s motion to dismiss Google’s

12
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
AUSTIN, TX

10

complaint until March 17, 2016.

13
14

The requested extension is GRANTED. Eolas’s reply to Google’s response to Eolas’s
motion to dismiss Google’s complaint will be filed no later than March 17, 2016.

15
16

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

March 8
DATED: ___________________, 2016

19
20
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-4CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST
McKool 1162781v1

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER