Luna et al v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. et al

Filing 236

ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/20/2018. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11 DANIEL LUNA, Individually and on Behalf of )
All Others Similarly Situated,
)
12
)
Plaintiff,
)
13
)
vs.
)
14
)
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., )
15 et al.,
)
)
16
Defendants.
)
)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1410348_1

Case No. 3:15-cv-05447-WHA
(Consolidated)
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN
OF ALLOCATION

1

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Lead Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval

2 of Class Action Settlement and Approval of Plan of Allocation (ECF No. 225) in the above3 captioned action; the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings herein and otherwise
4 being fully informed of the matters hereto;
5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

6

1.

For purposes of this Order, the terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set

7 forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated December 19, 2017. ECF No. 220.
8

2.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, this Court hereby finds and concludes

9 that due and adequate notice was directed to Persons who are Class Members advising them of the
10 Plan of Allocation and of their right to object thereto, and a full and fair opportunity was accorded to
11 such Persons and entities who are Class Members to be heard with respect to the Plan of Allocation.
12

3.

The Court hereby finds and concludes that the formula for the calculation of the

13 claims of Authorized Claimants, which is set forth in the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class
14 Action (the “Notice”) sent to Class Members, provides a fair and reasonable basis upon which to
15 allocate the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund provided by the settlement among eligible Class
16 Members, with due consideration having been given to administrative convenience and necessity.
17

4.

The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation, as set forth in the

18 Notice, is, in all respects, fair and reasonable, and the Court hereby approves the Plan of Allocation.
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

April 20, 2018.
20 DATED: ____________________
21

________________________________________
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1410348_1

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION - 3:15-cv-05447-WHA

-1-