Bluestone Innovations LLC v. G7 Corporation

Filing 34

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/10/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Steven T. Lowe, Esq. SBN 122208 steven@lowelaw.com Kris LeFan, Esq., SBN 278611 kris@lowelaw.com LOWE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 11400 Olympic Blvd., Suite 640 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Telephone: (310) 477-5811 Facsimile: (310) 477-7672 Hao Ni (pro hac vice) hni@nilawfirm.com NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC 8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500 Dallas, TX 75231 Telephone: (972) 331-4600 Facsimile: (972) 314-0900 CHARLES C. KOOLE - State Bar No. 259997 ckoole@glaserweil.com DAN LIU – State Bar No. 287074 dliu@glaserweil.com GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 553-3000 Facsimile: (310) 556-2920 Attorneys for Defendant G7 Corporation Attorneys for Plaintiff Bluestone Innovations LLC 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 15 BLUESTONE INNOVATIONS LLC, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL G7 CORPORATION, Defendant. JURY TRAIL DEMANDED 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 1 2 3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff Bluestone Innovations LLC (“Bluestone”) and Defendant G7 Corporation (“G7”) by and through their attorneys, do hereby jointly move for an 4 order approving their stipulation as follows: 5 1. Bluestone’s claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice. 6 2. G7’s counterclaims in this action are dismissed without prejudice. 7 3. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to this legal action and 8 9 10 the entry of this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. 4. The Court may enter an Order adopting this Stipulation of Dismissal (with Prejudice) and Proposed Order Thereon as the Order of the Court. 11 Dated: May 10, 2016 12 13 By: /s/ Hao Ni___ Hao Ni Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC Attorney for Plaintiff Bluestone Innovations LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: May 10, 2016 By: /s/ Charles C. Koole Charles C. Koole Dan Liu Attorneys for Defendant G7 Corporation 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH 1 FILER’S ATTESTATION 2 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Hao Ni, attest that concurrence in the filing 3 4 5 of this document has been obtained. Dated: May 10 2016 /s/ Hao Ni Hao Ni 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH 1 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 2 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff Bluestone Innovations LLC (“Bluestone”) and 3 Defendant G7 Corporation. (“G7”) parties to this legal action, by and through their attorneys, jointly 4 moved for an order approving their stipulation. After consideration of such motion, it is hereby 5 GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that: 7 8 1. Bluestone’s claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice; 2. 6 G7’s counterclaims in this action are dismissed without prejudice; and 3. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to this legal action and the entry of this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. 9 10 10th Signed this _____ day of May, 2016. 11 12 13 ___________________________________ United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?