Bluestone Innovations LLC v. G7 Corporation
Filing
34
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/10/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Steven T. Lowe, Esq. SBN 122208
steven@lowelaw.com
Kris LeFan, Esq., SBN 278611
kris@lowelaw.com
LOWE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
11400 Olympic Blvd., Suite 640
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Telephone: (310) 477-5811
Facsimile: (310) 477-7672
Hao Ni (pro hac vice)
hni@nilawfirm.com
NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC
8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75231
Telephone: (972) 331-4600
Facsimile: (972) 314-0900
CHARLES C. KOOLE - State Bar No. 259997
ckoole@glaserweil.com
DAN LIU – State Bar No. 287074
dliu@glaserweil.com
GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD
AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 553-3000
Facsimile: (310) 556-2920
Attorneys for Defendant
G7 Corporation
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bluestone Innovations LLC
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
14
15
BLUESTONE INNOVATIONS LLC,
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN
ORDER REFLECTING THE
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
G7 CORPORATION,
Defendant.
JURY TRAIL DEMANDED
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING
THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
1
2
3
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff Bluestone Innovations LLC (“Bluestone”) and
Defendant G7 Corporation (“G7”) by and through their attorneys, do hereby jointly move for an
4
order approving their stipulation as follows:
5
1.
Bluestone’s claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice.
6
2.
G7’s counterclaims in this action are dismissed without prejudice.
7
3.
Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to this legal action and
8
9
10
the entry of this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice.
4.
The Court may enter an Order adopting this Stipulation of Dismissal (with Prejudice) and
Proposed Order Thereon as the Order of the Court.
11
Dated: May 10, 2016
12
13
By: /s/ Hao Ni___
Hao Ni
Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC
Attorney for Plaintiff Bluestone
Innovations LLC
14
15
16
17
18
19
Dated: May 10, 2016
By: /s/ Charles C. Koole
Charles C. Koole
Dan Liu
Attorneys for Defendant
G7 Corporation
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH
1
FILER’S ATTESTATION
2
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Hao Ni, attest that concurrence in the filing
3
4
5
of this document has been obtained.
Dated: May 10 2016
/s/ Hao Ni
Hao Ni
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH
1
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
2
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff Bluestone Innovations LLC (“Bluestone”) and
3
Defendant G7 Corporation. (“G7”) parties to this legal action, by and through their attorneys, jointly
4
moved for an order approving their stipulation. After consideration of such motion, it is hereby
5
GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that:
7
8
1.
Bluestone’s claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice;
2.
6
G7’s counterclaims in this action are dismissed without prejudice; and
3.
Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to this legal action and
the entry of this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice.
9
10
10th
Signed this _____ day of May, 2016.
11
12
13
___________________________________
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-05483-PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?