DOE, et al v. San Mateo County, et al

Filing 116

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/27/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DOE,

Case No. 15-cv-05496-WHO
Plaintiff,

8
v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON
SETTLEMENT

9
10

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 114

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

The Court has been notified that the parties have agreed to a settlement.
IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings
scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court,

16
with proper notice to opposing counsel within 120 days from the date below, that settlement has not in

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further
proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 27, 2018
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge