Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank v. RPM Mortgage, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re: 22 : Case Management Conference continued from 3/17/2016 to 4/7/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 3/31/2016. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/2016. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 MORTGAGE RECOVERY LAW GROUP LLP PAUL A. LEVIN (State Bar No. 229077) 2 DANA J. CLAUSEN (State Bar No. 223212) 3 700 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 830 Glendale, California 91203 4 TELEPHONE: (818) 630-7900 FACSIMILE: (818) 630-7920 5 e-mail: paul.levin@mortgagerecoveries.com dana.clausen@mortgagerecoveries.com 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for 11 AMTRUST BANK 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. Case No. 3:15-cv-05534-EMC Hon. Edward M. Chen [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR APRIL 7, 2016 14 RPM MORTGAGE, INC., a California 15 corporation d/b/a RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC MORTGAGE, f/k/a NL, INC. 16 Defendant. 17 18 Current Date: Proposed Date: March 17, 2016 April 7, 2016 Time: Crtrm: 9:30 a.m. 5 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY 1 TO ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 The joint stipulation to reschedule the Case Management Conference in this 3 matter, submitted jointly by Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as 4 Receiver for AmTrust Bank and RPM Mortgage, Inc., d/b/a Residential Pacific 5 Mortgage f/k/a NL, Inc., is hereby GRANTED. 6 The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 17, 2016, 7 shall be continued to April 7, 2016. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 13 14 DATED: __________________ March 14, 2016 _____________________________ The Honorable Edward M. Chen 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [454410/1] 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?