UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Sturgill
Filing
5
AMENDED ORDER to Show Cause Re: Enforcement of Internal Revenue Service Summons by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
12
13
JOHN STURGILL,
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RE: ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
Respondent.
14
Good cause having been shown by the petitioner upon its petition filed in the above-
15
16
Case No. 15-cv-05565-EDL
entitled proceeding on December 4, 2015, it is hereby:
ORDERED that respondent John Sturgill appear before this Court on January 26, 2016 at
17
18
10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. E, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate
19
Avenue, San Francisco, California, and then and there show cause, if any, why respondent should
20
not be compelled to appear and provide documents and testimony as required by the summons
21
heretofore served upon respondent as alleged and set forth in particular in said petition; and it is
22
further
23
ORDERED that a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with a copy of the aforesaid
24
petition, be served upon said respondent in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil
25
Procedure at least thirty-five (35) days before the return date of this Order above specified; and it
26
is further
27
ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days before the return date of this Order,
28
respondent may file and serve a written response to the petition, supported by appropriate
1
affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance with 28 U.S.C. ยง 1746, as well as any motion
2
respondent desires to make, that the petitioner may file and serve a written reply to such response,
3
if any, within fourteen (14) days before the return date of this Order; that all motions and issues
4
raised by the pleadings will be considered on the return date of this Order, and only those issues
5
raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by
6
affidavit(s) or declaration(s) will be considered at the return of this Order, and any uncontested
7
allegation in the petition will be considered admitted.
8
ORDERED this 10th day of December, 2015, at San Francisco, California.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 10, 2015
12
________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?